HIGH COURT OF PATNA
B. P. Jha & M. P. Varma, JJ.
Dr. Hari Ram Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar and others - Respondents
C.W.J.C. No. 3197 of 1978
Decided on: 28-11-1979
MEDICAL COUNCIL ACT - REGULATION - APPOINTMENT OF LECTURER - SENIORITY-CUM-MERIT - GUIDELINES - WRIT OF CERTIORARI - QUASHING OF ORDERS - DIRECTIONS TO FOLLOW GUIDELINES.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a tutor in Orthopaedics, challenged the promotion of respondents 3 and 4 as Lecturers in Nalanda Medical College and Magadh Medical College, respectively, and the rejection of his representation by the Health Ministry of Bihar. The petitioner claimed seniority based on his teaching experience as a Casualty Registrar, Registrar in General Surgery, and Tutor in Orthopaedics.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the petitioner had teaching experience of 6 years 11 months and 18 days, while respondent no. 3 had 6 years and respondent no. 4 had 5 years 11 months and 15 days. The court found that the petitioner was senior to respondents 3 and 4 and should have been considered for appointment as a Lecturer.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner had the requisite teaching experience to be appointed as a Lecturer. 2. Whether the respondents 3 and 4 were senior to the petitioner. 3. Whether the petitioner's representation was properly considered by the Health Ministry.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the petitioner had the requisite teaching experience to be appointed as a Lecturer, as he had served as a teaching staff for more than four years in the Surgical Department, an allied subject of Orthopaedics, and as a tutor in Orthopaedics for 2 years 6 months and 17 days. 2. The court held that the petitioner was senior to respondents 3 and 4, as he had the highest teaching experience both in Orthopaedics and in the general line of surgery. 3. The court held that the petitioner's representation was not properly considered by the Health Ministry, as the order rejecting the representation was not a speaking order and no reason was assigned.
Final Decision: The court quashed the orders promoting respondents 3 and 4 as Lecturers and directed the respondents to follow the guidelines laid down in the judgment for the appointment of teaching staff.
B. P. Jha, J. - In an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the validity of annexures 12 and 17. By annexure-12, respondent no. 3 Dr. Basir Alam and respondent no. 4 Dr. Anant Kumar Mishra have been promoted to the post of Lecturers in Nalanda Medical College, Patna and Magadh Medical College, Gaya, respectively. By annexure-17, the representation of the petitioner was rejected by the Health Ministry of the State of Bihar.
2. The relevant facts are these:- The petitioner was appointed in the Bihar Health Service in the year 1962. He was posted as a Casualty Registrar in the Patna Medical College Hospital in between 28th January, 1965 and 29th June, 1966. He was also Registrar, General Surgery in Darbhanga Medical College Hospital between 24th May, 1971 and 23rd May, 1974, that is for three years. He was appointed as a tutor (Assistant Professor) in Orthopaedics on 25th July, 1975 and continuously worked as such till 10th February, 1978 (that is, for 2 years 6 months and 17 days), and he is still working on that post. According to him, he had thus teaching experience of about seven years, that is, 6 years 11 months 18 days.
3. It is being challenged by respondent no. 3 that the petitioner was a Casualty Officer and not Casualty Registrar and, as such, he had no teaching experience between 28th January, 1965 and 29th June, 1966. In this connection, learned counsel of the petitioner has referred to annexure-18. In annexure-18, the State Government clarified this position. It has been held by the State Government that those doctors who have held the post of Casualty Officers shall be Registrars (Casualty) with effect from 1st May, 1964. It is on the basis of annexure-16 the learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner should be treated as Casualty Registrar and not Casualty Officer between 28th January, 1965 and 29th June, 1966. In my opinion, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. By annexure-16, the petitioner shall be treated as Casualty Registrar with effect from 28th January, 1965. I, therefore, hold that the petitioner had teaching experience from 28th January, 1965 to 20th June, 1966 (that is to say, for one year five months and one day). The petitioner had further teaching• experience as Registrar, General Surgery, between 24th May, 1971 and 23rd May, 1974, that is, for three years. He had also teaching experience as tutor from 25th July, 1975 and onwards upto this date, that is, 28th November, 1979. For the purpose of counting teaching experience as a tutor, the petitioner had teaching experience for two years 6 months and 17 days, that is, upto 10th February, 1978. It is on the basis of these statements of facts that the petitioner claim to be senior to respondents 3 and 4.
4. So far as respondent no. 3 Dr. Basir Alam is concerned, he was appointed in the State Health Service on 14th March, 1967 and he was appointed as Lecturer on 10th February, 1978. By that time, he had teaching experience for 5 years 8 months and 1 day in the Orthopaedic Department.
5. So far as respondent no. 4 Dr. A. K. Mishra is concerned, he was appointed in the State Health Service on 9th October, 1963. According to the petitioner, he acted as Resident Surgical Officer for three years and as Registrar and tutor between 24th February, 1975 and 10th February, 1978, that is, for 2 years 11 months and 15 days. In other words, he had teaching experience for 5 years 11 months and 15 days. According to the learned counsel for Respondent no. 4, however, Respondent no. 4 had the teaching experience as Resident Surgical Officer for three years 1 month and 8 days. He further states that he acted as Registrar in the Patna Medical College Hospital from 24th October, 1972 to 23rd April, 1974 and in the Bhagalpur Medical College Hospital from 24th February, 1975 to 20th April, 1976, that is, for about four years. Thereafter he was appointed as tutor on 21st
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.