SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 422

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
NAGENDRA RAI & A.N. TRIVEDI, JJ.
Gait Public Library & Institute, Gardanibagh, Patna, through its President – Petitioner
Versus
State of Bihar & other – Respondents
CWJC No. 2671 of 1994
Decided on: 21.12.1994

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. Tara Kant Jha & Sandeep Kumar.
For the State:The Advocate General.

A lessee's possession, even after lease expiry, is juridical and can only be terminated through legal procedures. Forcible dispossession is prohibited.

Headnote:

LAND RESUMPTION - BIHAR GOVERNMENT ESTATES (KHAS MAHAL) MANUAL, 1953 - RULE 21 - PUBLIC PURPOSE - LEASE EXPIRY - FORCIBLE POSSESSION - JUDICIAL POSSESSION - EVICTION - RULE OF LAW - ARBITRARY ACTION - RESTORATION OF POSSESSION - LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A lessee's possession, even after lease expiry, is juridical and can only be terminated through legal procedures. Forcible dispossession is prohibited.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a society running a library and institute, challenged the State Government's order resuming and taking possession of the land and building leased to it. The lease had expired in 1945, and the petitioner continued in possession without renewal. The State claimed the resumption was for a public purpose, namely, shifting a college.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that Rule 21 of the Bihar Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953, which authorizes resumption of land for public purposes, was not applicable as the lease had expired. The court also found that the State had not followed the procedure prescribed under Rule 22, which requires obtaining a court order before taking possession if the lessee objects. The court further held that the State's action in taking forcible possession was arbitrary and unauthorized.

Issues: 1. Whether Rule 21 of the Bihar Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953, applies to a situation where the lease has expired. 2. Whether the State can forcibly take possession of leased land without following the procedure prescribed under Rule 22. 3. Whether the State's action in taking forcible possession was arbitrary and unauthorized.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Rule 21 of the Bihar Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953, applies only when there is a valid lease and the land is required for a public purpose. Once the lease expires, the question of resumption does not arise. 2. Rule 22 of the Bihar Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953, requires the State to obtain a court order before taking possession of leased land if the lessee objects. This procedure was not followed in the present case. 3. The State's action in taking forcible possession of the land was arbitrary and unauthorized as it was not supported by any legal authority.

Final Decision: The court quashed the State Government's order resuming and taking possession of the land and building. It also directed the State to hand over possession of the premises and books to the petitioner within three weeks. The State was further directed to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

NAGENDRA RAI, J.

1. With the consent of the parties the writ application has been heard at the stage of admission itself and is being disposed of by this order.

2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 3.3.1994 contained in memo no. 484 passed by the Collector, Patna (respondent no. 3) by which he has resumed the land of plot no. 2100 area 3.64 acres and building standing thereon situate on road no. 15, Gardanibagh in exercise of power under Rule 21 of the Bihar Government Estates (Khas Mahal) Manual, 1953, for the public purpose and directed the Anchal Adhikari to take possession of the same. A copy of the said order is annexed as Annexure-7 to the writ application. The petitioner has also challenged the action of the respondent authorities in taking forcible possession of the aforesaid land and the structures standing thereon on 10.3.1994.

3. There is no dispute that the said land belongs to the State Government and the same was leased out to the petitioner.

4. The petitioner's case is that it is a society registered under the Society Registration Act. The persons employed in the provincial Secretariat of the then province of Bihar and Orissa on 23.11.1916 established a library and a institute at Ranchi. At that time Ranchi was the temporary Capital of the then provision of Bihar and Orissa on separation from Bengal. Later on when the capital was shifted to Patna the aforesaid library and institute also shifted to Patna. In the year 1920 the then local government gave the aforesaid piece of land for establishing the library and institute and also sanctioned Rs. 2000/- for constructing a building. On 18.12.1920, Sir Edwar Albert Gait, the then Governor of Bihar and Orissa laid the foundation stone of the building of the library and the institute and the said institution was named after him. The amount given by the government was not sufficient to meet the cost of construction of the library, so the office bearers of the institute collected donations from the public and constructed the building. The main object for opening the library and the institute was to provide within an easy reach to the residents of the capital area an institution which might cater to their varying tastes of intellectual, moral, physical and social well being.

5. In early thirties, a part of the land was acquired by the State Government for construction of the Water Tower on Road No. 13, in Gardanibagh and also for the Gardanibagh Thakurbari and only about 3 acres of land remained in possession of the library and the institute. In 1934 the building was damaged due to earthquake as a result of which several books and papers were lost. In 1975 as well, due to flood in the Patha town the papers concerning the library and the books were damaged and lost. Due to the aforesaid reasons the documents including deed of lease of land executed in 1920 was not traceable, however, a deed lease executed in the year, 1939 (Annexure-13) was made available after great efforts, from perusal of which it transpires that on 10th November, 1925 a lease for 10 years was executed in favour of the institute. It further appears that after expiry of the aforesaid period the petitioner with the consent of the lessor State Government remained in possession of the land and building and a fresh lease was executed in the year, 1939 for a period of 10 years commencing from February, 1935. After expiry of the aforesaid period of lease the petitioner continued in possession and the Government from time to time granted aid and also appointed its nominees in the Managing Committee of the library.

6. In the year, 1991 the Secretary of the Library was asked to attend the meeting in the chamber of the Chief Minister with regard to selection of a site of Gardanibagh College. The Secretary participated and suggested different sites. Thereafter, without any information or opportunity of hearing the impugned order has been passed by the Col





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top