SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Pat) 285

HIGH COURT OF PATNA (RANCHI BENCH)
NAGENDRA RAI, J.
Enamul Haque
Versus
State of Bihar & others – Respondents
CWJC Nos. 291, 303, 415, 463, 475 & 476 of 1994 (R)

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s. Ashok Srivastava, P.S. Dayal, S.P Sinha, S.K. Srivastava, P.C. Roy, A.N. Deo & N. Kaparia.
For the Respondents:Government Pleader No.1 (Government Advocate)

The bar created under Section 52C of the Indian Forest Act, as amended by Bihar Act 9 of 1990, ousts the jurisdiction of all courts and tribunals, including the High Court under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, to make orders with respect to possession, delivery, disposal or distribution of the property which is the subject matter of confiscation proceedings.

Headnote:

FOREST ACT - Confiscation of Forest Produce - Jurisdiction of Courts - Bar of Jurisdiction - Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.

Fact of the Case:

In all the cases, the owners filed applications in the High Court for the release of trucks and matador which were seized in connection with transporting forest produce in contravention of the provisions of the Forest Act. The High Court by interim order released the vehicles in all the cases on furnishing bonds.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that once the confiscation proceeding has been initiated and the matter has been brought to the notice of the Magistrate by the authorised forest officer, the jurisdiction of the Criminal Court is ousted to pass any order for disposal of the property which includes forest produce as well as the vehicle etc. used in the commission of the offence. The bar created under Section 52C will also oust the jurisdiction of the High Court under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.

Issues: 1. Whether in view of the specific provisions as contained in Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) substituted by Bihar Act 9 of 1990 for confiscation of forest produce in respect of which forest offence has been committed and the vehicles etc. used in committing the offence and the provisions of Section 52-C inserted by the aforesaid Bihar Act barring jurisdiction of the Courts to make orders with respect to possession, delivery, disposal or distribution of the property with regard to which intimation of initiation of confiscation proceeding has been given to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence, any Court or tribunal has power to make order with regard to release of the forest produce and the vehicles etc. during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding. 2. Whether the bar created by Section 52-C applies to the application filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure dealing with the disposal of the property have to give way to the special provisions contained under the Forest Act as brought by the State Amendment. 2. The confiscation proceeding altogether is a separate proceeding. The provisions of disposal of property under the Code must yield to the special provisions of the confiscation under the Act. 3. The power or discretion under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India is to be exercised on well established principles and not arbitrarily and it is subject to the certain self imposed restrictions. Its object is to see that authorities and tribunals act within the bound of their jurisdiction. No writ can be issued to frustrate the object of the Act. Nor it can be issued to make a valid statutory enactment otiose and redundant.

Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the applications filed by the owners for the release of the vehicles.

JUDGMENT

NAGENDRA RAI, J.

1. In all the aforesaid cases common question of law is involved and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment at the stage of admission itself.

2. The questions for determination in these cases are two folds. Firstly, whether in view of the specific provisions as contained in Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) substituted by Bihar Act 9 of 1990 for confiscation of forest produce in respect of which forest offence has been committed and the vehicles etc. used in committing the offence and the provisions of Section 52-C inserted by the aforesaid Bihar Act barring jurisdiction of the Courts to make orders with respect to possession, delivery, disposal or distribution of the property with regard to which intimation of initiation of confiscation proceeding has been given to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence, any Court or tribunal has power to make order with regard to release of the forest produce and the vehicles etc. during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding. Secondly, whether the bar created by Section 52-C applies to the application filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.

3. In all the cases the owners have filed the applications in this Court for release of the trucks and matador which were seized in connection with transporting forest produce in contravention of the provisions of the Forest Act.

4. In CWJC No. 291 of 1994 (R) the petitioner has come against the order by which the application filed for the release of vehicle before the Divisional Forest Officer under the Act, before whom the confiscation proceeding is pending has been rejected and in other cases the petitioners have filed the application against the orders passed by the learned Magistrates rejecting their application for release of the vehicle on the ground that the confiscation proceeding is pending under Section 52 of the Forest Act as amended by the Bihar Act. This Court by interim order has released the vehicles in all the cases on furnishing bonds. In view of the nature of the point involved in this case, it is not necessary to state the fact in detail. Suffice it to say that the vehicles are alleged to have been seized while carrying out forest produce in contravention of the provisions of the Forest Act. Except in CWJC No. 291 of 1994 (R) in all the cases the criminal prosecution has been initiated against them by lodging the F.I.R. for the offences under the aforesaid Act as well as under the Indian Penal Code, It is also admitted position that in all the cases confiscation proceeding has been initiated under the provisions of Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act as amended by Bihar Act, 9 of 1990.

5. At the very outset I may mention that we the Indians traditionally revere nature and worship the trees. The forest plays an important role in our life. It maintains environmental and ecological balance. Its destruction would create environmental and ecological problem. There is world wide awareness to protect forest. The world community as a whole is engaged in evolving plans for preservation and improvement of environment.

6. By 42nd Amendment Articles 48A and 51A have been incorporated in the Constitution imposing duty on the State and the citizen to protect and improve environment.

Article 48A reads as follows:–

"The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country."

The relevant part of Article 51A reads as follows:–

51-A "It shall be the duty of every citizen of India.

(g) To protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures."

7. The aforesaid amendment in the Constitution shows that it is not only the duty of the State but also the duty of every citizen to protect and improve the environment and natural resources of the country.

8. Apart from the Ind


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top