SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Pat) 344

S.R.SINHA, AMIR DAS
Card Board Products – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Tapen Sen and Prabhash Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.Y. Eqbal.

JUDGMENT

S. B. Sinha, J.

The petitioners in this application have, inter-alia, prayed for quashing of a notice dated 26.7.1993 as contained in Annexure 18 to the writ petition. The petitioners have also filed supplementary affidavit annexing therewith another notice dated 4.8.1993 issued by the Anchal Adhikari

(respondent no. 8) purported to be under section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act (here-in-after to be referred to as 'the Act') whereby and where under the petitioners have been directed to show cause as to why the encroachment allegedly made by the petitioners in Plot No. 278 of village Sasbera, measuring an area of 0.77 acrcs shall not be directed to be removed.

2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, it is not necessary to state the fact of the mailer in great details.

3. The petitioner no.1 is a partnership firm and petitioners no. 2 to 5 are its partners. Petitioner No.1 is a owner of the factory which produces fibre board containers for packing and transporting explosives. As the respondents allegedly had been interfering with the affairs of the said business, the petitioners filed a writ petition being Cr.W.J.C. No. 266 of 1993 (R) and by order dated 5.7






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top