SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 322

UDAY SINHA, B.N.AGRAWAL
Yugal Kishore Rastogi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner: M/s G.C. Bharuka, N.P. Singh, Ramesh Kr. Agrawal
For the respondents: G.P.5

Order

dated 25.9.1981

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is a licensee under the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order. His shop was inspected. In pursuance of some delinquency having been found, his licence was suspended by order dated 3.6.1987. The order communicated to the petitioner by Annexure-1 was that his licence shall remain suspended until the disposal of confiscation proceeding in terms of section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act. The order suspending the licence until the disposal of the confiscation proceeding was per se illegal. It cannot be doubted that the present case is one of an interim suspension. Clause 11 (2) of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order lays down that during the pendency of a proceeding for cancellation of licence or pending contemplation of proceeding for cancellation of licence the licence maybe suspended for a period not exceeding ninety-days. Ninety days have already expired in the instant case. In that view of the matter, the interim suspension of the petitioner's licence is hereby quashed. The application is allowed accordingly.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top