SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Pat) 146

B.P.SINHA
Kartik Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the petitioners: Mr. Shiva Nandan Roy.
For the respondent No.3: Mr. U.K. Choudhary.

JUDGMENT :

Birendra Prasad Sinha, J.

This writ application is directed against an ORDER :dated 8.7.1981 contained in Annexure-2. This ORDER :has been passed under section 48E(8) of the Bihar Tenancy Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in Case No. 95/23 of 1980-81 by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Madhepura, respondent no. 2 declaring respondent no. 3 as Bataidar over 2.98 acres of land appertaining to khata no. 298, khesra No. 303, Khata No. 200 Khesra No. 304 and Khata No. 181 Khesra No. 230.

2. Respondent no. 3 Lakhan Sahni claimed that he was a Bataidar over 7 plots measuring 9 bighas 28½ (sic) kathas belonging to the petitioner. A Board was constituted and witnesses of both sides were examined. After considering their evidence and other material" on record the learned Anchal Adhikari came to the ultimate finding that respondent has forcibly cultivated the land in question in that year and had sown Kalai in it. It was recommended that if that was acceptable, the respondent no. 3 may be declared as a Bataidar. The relevant portion of the finding, which is in Hindi is quoted hereunder:

^^xk¡o esa nyxr jktuhfr ds dkj.k Li”V :i ls dksbZ fu”i{k O;fDr dqN ugha dg ldkA nyxr yksx v






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top