SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Pat) 24

S.ROY, A.SINGH
Bandhan Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Satyeshwar Roy and Abhiram Singh, JJ.-Two persons were put on trial in a case under section 396 of the Indian Penal Code. During the course of trial, one of them, namely Jamua, died. The appellant was found guilty under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.

2. On 8.7.1982, P. W. 5 lodged an information with the police that in the previous night there was a dacoity in. their house. In course of the dacoity rice and utensils were taken away and Chamar Singh was murdered. P. W. 5 did not name anybody as the person who had committed dacoity in their house. However, during the course of investigation, the appellant and another were apprehended, In the T. I. Parade, the appellant was identified by P. Ws. 2 and 5. The Court below relied on the evidence of these two witnesses and found the appellant guilty.

3. P. W. 1 was the son of Chamar Singh, P. W. 2 was the brother of Chamar Singh and P. W. 3 was a neighbour of Chamar Singh and in whose house also there was a dacoity. P. W. 5 was widow of Chamar Singh. In the Test Identification Parade, these four persons were witnesses. P. Ws. 1 and 3 could not identify anybody from out of th



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top