ORDER :no. 18 dated 28.9.1985

While hearing the bail petition of Sagir Ahmad in this application the Court refused to grant bail to said Sagir Ahmad and called for a report. from the Sessions Judge as to under what circumstances accused Seth Mian was granted bail in proceeding under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code punishable to rigorous imprisonment for ten years. On a perusal of the records of the case this Court passed an ORDER :on 20.3.85 issuing notice to Seth Mian as to why the ORDER :granting bail to him be not cancelled.

2. The prosecution case is that some Hindu ladies of the village went to visit a temple and were participating in puja-path, Seth Mian along with a few others came to the temple premises. Seth Mina focussed torch on the faces of the ladies participating in pujapath and picked up a married lady and a young girl from the temple. When the mother of the victim girl objected to the kidnapping she was, assaulted. Seth Mian and others there after released the married lady after having looked to the feature but they became traceless with the young girl. From the prosecution case it appears that the main role has been assigned to Seth Miau.

3. On 26.2.1977 the bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document