S.S.SANDHAWALIA, S.K.JHA
Uday Banerjee – Appellant
Versus
P. R. Dutta – Respondent
S.K. Jha. – A reference of this Civil Revision application to the Division Bench with regard to the true interpretation of section 14 (8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) control Act, 1982 (Bihar Act No. 4 of 1983) (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of brevity and convenience) has been necessitated by and is reminiscent of an old saying id perferctum est quod ex omnibus suis partious constat; et nihi perfectum est dum aliquied restal agendum; that is perfect which is complete in all its parts, and nothing is perfect whilst anything remains to be done. In this case the difficulty has arisen not from anything inherent in the subject itself which might be quite simple treated but by the loose draftsmanship which of late, has become more frequent in view of the vase increase in the number of new legislative enactments from time to time. When this case came up before a learned single judge of this Court at the admission stage itself a preliminary objection was raised by learned counsel for the opposite party that no civil revision application could be entertained under section 14(8) of the Act. This is once impels me to quote in extensor secti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.