SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Pat) 67

B.S.SINHA
JAGARNATH DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
RAM KRIPAL TEWARY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Angad OJha for the Petitioners;
Messrs Rewati Raman Saran and S. P. Dwivedi for the Opp. Party.

JUDGMENT :

B. S. Sinha, J.

This application by the defendants in the suit is directed against the ORDER :dated the 7th October, 1977 passed in Title Appeal no. 15 of 1975 by Shri R. C. Jain, Subordinate Judge, Buxar, by this ORDER :the lower appellate court has held that the lower appellate court has held that the appeal has not abated under Section 4 (c) of the Bihari Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Consolidation Act)

2. The relevant facts are that the plaintiff opposite party filed a suit for redemption of two mortgage bonds and delivery of possession as well as means profits. The suit was dismissed on 3.5.1976 against which the plaintiffs appealed which has been numbered as Title Appeal 15 of 1975. In this appeal on 27.9.1977 the defendants filed an application stating that the appeal had abated under Section 4 (c) of the Consolidation Act, as the village in which the lands were situate has been subject to a notification under Section 3 (1) of the Consolidation Act. By the impugned ORDER :the learned Subordinate Judge has held that the appeal has not abated.

3. Mr. Angad Ojha in support of this application has urged












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top