SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 715

J.N.SINGH
SHAILESH KUMAR OJHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Chitranjan Sinha, Mithlesh Kumar Rai and Arun Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar

ORDER :

In this writ application petitioner has challenged the ORDER :of his dismissal, as contained in Annexure-11, passed by the Principal Secretary of the Revenue and Land Reforms Department as well as the ORDER :of rejection of his review application, as contained in Annexure-13.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has placed before this Court the charges framed against the petitioner, as contained in Annexure-5. The charges were found proved by the Inquiry Officer. Hence, a second show cause notice was issued along with a copy of the enquiry report and petitioner was given an opportunity to file representation against the same. Accordingly, petitioner filed his representation, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-10. This representation runs into 11 pages. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has placed the representation in detail before this Court from which it appears that the petitioner has given the facts and circumstances of the case in detail which ultimately led to passing of the ORDER :by the Collector, Kishanganj settling the lands in favour of the allottees for tea plantation under the Industrial Policy of 1995. He has taken a categorical stand in his re






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top