SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 2046

JAYANANDAN SINGH
Md. Shami Uddin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Amaresh Kumar Singh & Dineshwar Singh.
For the State: A.C. to G.A. 5

ORDER :

J.N. Singh, J. - Petitioner has filed this writ application for quashing of a memo no. 7481 dated 25.09.2007 (Annexure–6), issued by the respondent no.6 enclosing an ORDER :of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 20.09.2007, by which, recalling his earlier ORDER :dated 21.03.2007, he has disposed of the petition of the petitioner, finding no error in the appointment of respondent no.7, by rejecting the alternative plea of the petitioner that respondent no.7, with higher points of 17, should have been shifted in the category of general category candidates and hence, petitioner with 15 points, should have been adjusted on the vacancy for reserved category candidate. He has further prayed for also quashing of memo no. 2332 dated 20.12.2007 (Annexure–8), containing an ORDER :of the District Collector, by which, as a follow-up action to the said ORDER :of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 25.09.2007, his appointment as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, made by the ORDER :of the Panchayat Secretary dated 13.07.2007 (Annexure–5), pursuant to the said earlier ORDER :of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 21.03.2007, has been cancelled.

2. Facts of the case are that in 2005 there were two vacancies of Shiksha Mitra










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top