SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Pat) 53

S.C.MISRA, K.B.N.SINGH
CHATURBHUJ V. ABYA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF SINGHBHUM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Messrs J.C. Sinha and G.M. Sinha for the Petitioners; Messrs S. Sarwar Ali and N.N. Roy for the Opp. Party.

JUDGMENT

Misra, C.J.

This is an application for quashing Kolhan Title Suit no. 3 of 1967 pending in the court of opposite party no. 2, the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Singhbhum. The suit was instituted by opposite party no. 3, Dharamchand Jain, against the petitioner, claiming mainly the relief of recovery of possession of the properties described in the schedule attached to the plaint and the Additional Deputy Commissioner entertained the suit under a rule which is popularly known as Wilkinson's Rules. The petitioner has challenged the validity of these rules in so far as they provide for the maintainability of such title suits in the Court of the Additional Deputy Commissioner.

2. The main ground on which the validity of these rules has been challenged is that Regulation XIII of 1833 provided that the Governor-General of India in Council shall be competent to prescribe such rules as be would deem proper for the guidance of officers for the administration of civil and criminal justice and such rules prescribed by him came to be known as Wilkinson's Rules, but in fact these rules were never made by the Governor-General. The rules were in fact made by Captain T. Wilkinson, who wa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top