SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 373

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Anwar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Anjum Pravez – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

2. The present appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgement and decree dated 15-09-2011 and 21-10-2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge, I, Nawada in Title Appeal No. 03/ 1997 whereby he has affirmed the judgement dated 20-12-1996 and decree dated 04-01-1997 passed in Title (Eviction) Suit No. 27/1985 by learned Additional Munsif, I, Nawada.

3. The defendant-tenant is the appellant before this court. Learned trial court had decreed the suit filed on behalf of respondents in favour of the plaintiff directing the appellant to be evicted from the suit premises as well as for payment of arrears of rent of the disputed premises. The disputed property as described in schedule-A to the plaint was a hut situated on Khata No. 16, Plot No. 4511/6224 in police station and district Nawada.

4. The original plaintiff, Dr. Maizuddin, whose sons have been impleaded as party respondents in the present appeal, filed the Title (Eviction) Suit on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord for his own occupation of the suit premises as also on the ground that the defendants deliberately defaulted i



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top