V. NATH, J.:–Heard Mr. Bishwanath Choudhary, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The present second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff (now deceased through her L.R.) against the judgment and decree dated 27.05.1988 passed by Sub Judge I, Aurangabad in T.A.No. 44/76 upholding the dismissal of the suit.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the plaintiff has filed the suit mainly for declaring her as Raiyat of the suit land and for declaration that the defendant has acquired no right, title or interest on the basis of auction sale which is illegal and void, and for recovery of possession. The plaintiff’s case is that the lands in dispute had been recorded in equal shares in the names of Laxman Dushadh and Lachhu Dushadh who were in possession as separate members of the family. The plaintiff has claimed to have inherited the 8 annas share therein as deceased son’s wife of Lachhu Dushadh. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant, claiming to have purchased the suit land through auction sale in Execution Case No. 152/58 on 23.11.61 and to have obtained delivery of possession on the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document