SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 469

JYOTI SARAN
Anil Kumar Ram @ Anil Ram – Appellant
Versus
Pares Nath Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Amresh Kumar Verma
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Manbansh

ORAL ORDER

Heard Mr. Amresh Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant-petitioner and Mr. Pramod Manbansh, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff-opposite party no.1.

2. This civil revision application under section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.11.2011passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division-II, Samastipur in Eviction Suit No.04 of 2008, whereby the learned trial court has been pleased to order for eviction of the defendant who is petitioner before this Court requiring him to vacate the suit premise within a period of sixty days from the date of the judgment, failing which the plaintiff would be entitled to take possession of the same through the process of the Court.

3. The eviction suit in question was instituted by the plaintiff-opposite party no.1 for a decree of eviction of the defendant-petitioner from the suit premise, which is a shop situated in Ward No.8 (old), 14 (new), Mauza- Maghardahi, Holding No.245 AC Pant having an area of 16’ east-west and 10’.9” north-south. The shop belongs to the plaintiff a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top