SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Pat) 803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, J.
Parvati Kumari, wife of Ramakant Singh & Ors.(in all) - Petitioners
Versus
The State Government through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Bihar,
Patna & Ors. (in all)- Respondent
C.W.J.C. Nos. 7237 of 1999, 10437 of 2002 and 13136 of 2001
Decided on: 25.7.2013

Advocate Appeared:
For the petitioners:M/s Yugal Kishore, Sr Advocate with Dr Anjani Pd Singh , Abhinav Srivastava & Ajeet Kr
For the State : M/s Pushkar Narain Shahi, AAG XIV, Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, SC 9 & Mr. Raj Kamal, AC to SC 9
For the University:M/s Ashok Kumar Kesari, M/s Anil Singh & Shilpi Kesari, Advocates

The exercise of discretion by the State must be reasonable and cannot be arbitrary. The State's actions were found to be grossly arbitrary and highly discriminatory without any lawful reason or rationale.

Headnote:

Recurring Grant - Educational Institution - 1. Bihar Intermediate Education Council, 2. Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University - The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the order justifying the stoppage of recurring grant to the college. The recurring grant was ordered to be restored and continued until a decision was taken by the State regarding deficit grant status or constituent status, which was to be decided within six months.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, including the Principal of Sanjay Gandhi Smarak Mahila College, sought relief from the court to set aside the withdrawal of the annual recurring Government grant, grant status of deficit grant college, and to take over the college as a constituent college under the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The college was established in 1980 exclusively for women in a rural area lacking exclusive women's colleges.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the State's actions were inconsistent with its professed policy and had been obeyed more in breach. It held that the cancellation of the recurring grant and the deprivation of deficit grant or constituent status to the college could not be justified. The court directed the restoration of the recurring grant and ordered the State to decide on deficit grant or constituent status within six months.

Issues: The main issue was whether the State's action in withdrawing the recurring grant and denying deficit grant or constituent status to the college was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the State's actions were inconsistent with its professed policy and had been obeyed more in breach. It emphasized that the exercise of discretion by the State must be reasonable and cannot be arbitrary, and that the State's actions were grossly arbitrary and highly discriminatory without any lawful reason or rationale.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the order justifying the stoppage of recurring grant to the college. The recurring grant was ordered to be restored and continued until a decision was taken by the State regarding deficit grant status or constituent status, which was to be decided within six months.

JUDGMENT

Navaniti Pd Singh, J.

1. These three writ petitions have been filed by Smt Parvati Kumari and others. She happens to be the Principal of Sanjay Gandhi Smarak Mahila College, Sheikhpura. In substance, by these three writ petitions reliefs that are sought by the petitioners are :

(i) For setting aside the letter by which annual recurring Government grant to the college amounting to Rs 10 lacs was withdrawn;

(ii) To grant status of deficit grant college to the petitioners college and;

(iii) In the larger public interest to take over the college as constituent college under the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

2. It may be noted that initially, the first writ petition was filed in the year, 1999 followed later by the other two writ petitions. They were all admitted for final hearing.

3. Counter affidavits have been filed with replies thereto. At one stage, petitioners brought on record that there were several colleges which were established, affiliated later than the petitioners; colleges that were not found fit to be taken over but all those colleges were granted the deficit grant status, which is more than recurring grant and, some of them were even made constituent. But, for no good reason or no reason at all, petitioners college was never considered even though they had recommendations for take over and/or financial support from the Chancellor of the University, from the Chief Minister and from the University as well. When such affidavits were filed, this Court directed the State to specifically respond to the issues in relation to the facts as pleaded. Number of adjournments were granted but State, on one pretext or the other, avoided filing direct affidavit on the issues. At one stage, it was even reported that in respect of those colleges suddenly the files disappeared from the Secretariat relieving them of the obligation to controvert the facts. This Court took a very strict view of the matter and then one by one the files reappeared but State decided not to file any further counter affidavit controverting the facts in relation to the petitioners college or for that matter, facts relating to other colleges.

4. Basic plea, as sought to be established by the petitioners, was of arbitrariness and hostile discrimination as against the plea of the State that the State policy did not permit giving any financial assistance to any educational institution. It is in this perspective that the facts have first to be seen.

5. Sheikhpura was a subdivision of Munger district which happens to be one of the oldest districts in the State. It became a full fledged district ultimately in the year, 1994. It is quite some distance away both from Munger or from Bhagalpur. This rural town has a descent population but lacked exclusive women’s college. In absence of women’s college, girls and ladies of Sheikhpura were seriously handicapped in getting their education at intermediate or college level as in such rural areas, grown up girls are not encouraged to go to colleges which are co-educational. It is with the object of providing higher education that is college education to girls and encouraging them to pursue their studies that this college Sanjay Gandhi Smarak Mahila College at Sheikhpura was established in June, 1980 exclusively for women. Initially, it started as an exclusively Inter College that is imparting education to girls/ladies at intermediate level. Being encouraged by the response as it was the only exclusively women’s college, the college got affiliation for various subjects from the Bihar Intermediate Education Council on 16.02.1982 (Annexure 14) and had a large number of girl students studying upto Intermediate. The college, having its own extensive land and building as well as qualified teaching staff, then applied for affiliation with Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University for graduate level courses. The application of the college was forwarded with necessary inspection report to the State Government by the s
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top