2013 Supreme(Pat) 1124
HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Bhutai Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Yogesh Chandra Verma, Uday Chandra Prasad, Binod Kumar Sinha, Manoj Kumar.
For the State : Mrs. Abha Singh.
For the informant : M/s Ripudaman Prasad Sinha, Yogesh Kumar.
HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,J.:–This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction dated 19.7.2001 and sentence order dated 21.7.2001 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge III, Madhepura in Sessions trial no. 33 of 1989 by which and whereunder he convicted appellant no. 4, Gurudeo Sah for the offences punishable under sections 148, 448, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, appellant nos. 2 and 3 for the offences punishable under sections 148, 448, 307/34 of the IPC and appellant no. 1, Bhutai Sah for the offences punishable under sections 147, 448, 323, 307/34 of the IPC and accordingly, sentenced the appellant no.4, Gurudeo Sah to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence punishable under section 307 part II of the IPC, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced the rest appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence punishable under section 307 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and furthermore, appellant no.1, Bhutai Sah was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for each offence punishable under sect
Click Here to Read the rest of this document