SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Pat) 49

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Bhim Mahton – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Ajit Kumar Ojha, Nutan Mishra.
For the State : Mr. S.N. Prasad.

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.:–Sole appellant Bhim Mahton who has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 394 IPC and directed to undergo R.I. for 10 years as well as also fined Rs.10,000/-, under Section 397 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years, under Section 411 IPC sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years as well as fined Rs.5000/-, no separate sentence under Section 27 of the Arms Act with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently vide judgment of conviction dated 29.08.2013 and sentence dated 06.09.2013 passed by Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, IVth, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No.343 of 2010 has challenged under present appeal.

2. PW-2, Birendera Kumar while was admitted at the clinic of Dr. Ashok Sharma (PW-8) on 15.04.2008 at about 08:00 P.M. gave his fardbeyan disclosing therein that on the same day at about 11:20 A.M. he along with his master Anjani gone to deposit cash appertaining to Rs.5,82,000/- were intercepted by criminals who tried to snatch bag containing Rs.3,55,000/- and having faced resistance at his end, one of them shot at and succeeded in snatching of bag containing Rs.3,55,000/- and then all of them flew there from over motor
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top