V.NATH
Om Prakash Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Sarju Pd. – Respondent
Heard Mr. J.K. Verma, the learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Harish Kumar, the learned counsel for the sole respondent and Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, the learned counsel for the applicants, who have prayed to be added as intervener-respondents in this appeal.
2. This appeal has been filed by the defendant-appellants against the judgment and decree of reversal by the appellate court below whereby the appeal has been allowed setting aside the dismissal of the suit. The suit has been filed by the plaintiff-respondent for the reliefs seeking partition the half share in the suit property and also for declaration of the gift deeds dated 05.04.1991 executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant nos. 2 to 4 for the suit land as nullity, forged, fabricated, inoperative and not binding upon the plaintiff.
3. A compromise petition (I.A. No. 666 of 2013) has been filed by the parties to the appeal stating therein that they have amicably resolved their dispute and have agreed for disposal of appeal in terms of the compromise enumerated in the compromise petition. In the compromise petition, the plaintiff-respondent has admitted the fact of previous partition of the family prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.