A.K. Trivedi, J.- Informant/petitioner being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment of acquittal dated 8.5.2003 passed by Presiding Officer, Additional Court No. 1 (FTC), Sasaram in connection with Sessions Trial No. 284/2002/30/2002 has filed the instant revision petition.

2. While assailing the judgment of acquittal it has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that the learned lower Court had not considered the evidence adduced on behalf of prosecution under proper perceptiveness. It has further been submitted that process of scrutinizing of the evidence by the learned trial Court divulges the pre-occupied mind of the learned P.O. leaning in favour of O.P./accused on account of which, the interest of prosecution is found severely daunt. It has further been submitted that in spite of having sufficient material on record to justify conviction of the opposite parties, the aforesaid relevant pieces of evidences have completely been ignored. Further, elaborating the points. it has been submitted that the learned lower Court misconstrued the legal position that the evidence of hostile witnesses should be brushed aside in its totality. It has further been submitted that