PATNA HIGH COURT
I.A. ANSARI AND KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL, JJ.
Tamanna Khan & Anr.
Zarina Khatoon - Appellants
Versus
State of Bihar - Respondent (in both cases)
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1269 of 2007 with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1337 of 2007
Decided On : February 26, 2014
NDPS Act - Conviction under Sections 20 and 47(c) of Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - [NDPS Act, Section 20, Section 47(c), Bihar Excise Act, 1915] - The court discussed the prosecution's case, the evidence presented, and the lack of corroboration for the alleged recovery and seizure of ganja. It highlighted the failure to follow the required procedures for sealing and preserving the seized materials, leading to doubts about the evidence. The court emphasized that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's conscious and exclusive possession of ganja, resulting in the acquittal of the accused-appellants.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused were involved in the sale and purchase of ganja. The evidence presented included raids on the accused's houses and the recovery and seizure of ganja. However, key witnesses turned hostile, casting doubt on the prosecution's case.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to provide convincing and reliable evidence to prove the accused's conscious and exclusive possession of ganja. It highlighted discrepancies in the evidence, including the lack of corroboration and failure to follow required procedures for sealing the seized materials.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the credibility of the evidence presented by the prosecution, the lack of corroboration for the alleged recovery and seizure of ganja, and the failure to follow the required procedures for preserving the seized materials.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the prosecution must prove the accused's conscious and exclusive possession of the seized substance. It highlighted the importance of following the prescribed procedures for sealing and preserving seized materials to avoid doubts about the evidence.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the conviction of the accused-appellants was set aside. They were acquitted of the charges, and the lower court was directed to release them from custody, unless they were required in connection with any other case.
I.A. Ansari, J.
These appeals have put to challenge the judgment, dated 07.09.2007, passed, in G.O. Case No. 05 of 2005, by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Darbhanga, whereby the accused-appellants, namely, Tamanna Khan, Chanda Khatoon and Zarina Khatoon, stand convicted under Sections 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, 'NDPS Act') and Section 47 (c) of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915. In consequence of their conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, the accused-appellant, namely, Zarina Khatoon, stands, under the order dated 12.09.2007, sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and pay fine of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) and, in default of payment of fine, undergo simple imprisonment for six months. For their conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, the two other accused-appellants, namely, Tamanna Khan and Chanda Khatoon, stand, under the order, dated 12.09.2007, aforementioned, sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of fifteen years and pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/ - (one lakh) each and, in default of payment of fine, undergo simple imprisonment for one year. However, no separate sentence was passed for the conviction of the three accused-appellants under Section 47(c) of the Bihar Excise Act. 1915.
2. The ease of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be described as under:
(i) On 06.06.2005, at 05:15 a.m., PW 3, Officer-in-Charge, Sadar Police Station, Darbhanga, received information from confidential source that accused Zarina Khatoon sells ganja (cannabis) from her house. This information was recorded in the station diary by Entry No. 112, dated 06.06.2005. Having organized a raiding party, consisting of PW 4, Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, PW 5, PW 6, PW 7 and PW 8, Homeguard Constables, and PW 9, Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, PW 3 went to the house of accused Zarina Khatoon and. having found ganja (cannabis), there, the same was weighed and seized, vide seizure 'memo (Exhibit-1), in presence of, amongst others, PW 1 and PW 2, namely, Jitu Kumar Paswan and Sitaram Sharma, respectively, who are not neighbours of Zarina Khatoon, but persons living in nearby area, by, the weight of ganja, so found and seized, being 11.5 kgs. On interrogation, accused Zarina Khatoon made a confessional statement (Exhibit 4) disclosing therein names of three other accused persons, namely, Tamanna Khan, Chanda Khatoon and Satto Ram, as persons involved in the purchase and sale of ganja (cannabis).
(ii) Based on the information, so derived, PW 4, Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, posted at Sadar Police Station, Darbhanga, raided, with the help of his raiding party, the house of accused Tamanna Khan and his wife, accused Chanda Khatoon, and recovered and seized, in presence of witnesses, 36 kgs. of ganja by seizure memo (Exhibit-2). Even the house of accused Satto Ram was raided and from his house, too, ganja, weighing 1 kg., was recovered and seized. The seized materials were brought, along with Zarina Khatoon and Tamanna Khan, to Sadar Police Station, Darbhanga, because accused Chanda Khatoon had fled away on witnessing the police arriving at her house and accused Satto Ram had not been found in his house.
(iii) A fardbayan, in writing, was lodged by the Officer- in-Charge, Sadar Police Station, Darbhanga and treating the said fardbayan as First Information Report, Sadar P.S. Case No. 134 of 2005, under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act read with Section 47 (c) of Bihar Excise Act, 1915, was registered.
(iv) During investigation, seized ganja was sealed and two samples, drawn therefrom, were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory (in short, 'FSL'), which opined that the samples were of ganja (cannabis).
(v) On completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was laid, under Sections 20 and 23 of the NDPS Act read with Section 47(c) of Bihar Excise Act, 1915, against accused Zarina Khatoon, Tamanna Kh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.