SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Pat) 368

RAKESH KUMAR
Ajay Kumar Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Uday Bhanu Roy, Anant Kumar.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta.

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KUMAR, J.:–Heard.

2. The present petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “Cr.P.C.”) with a prayer to quash an order dated 24-05-2000 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria (hereinafter referred to as “Magistrate”) in Case No. CC 19/1997. By the said order, learned Magistrate had taken cognizance of offence under Sections 211 and 182 of the Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) and summoned the petitioner. Further, the petitioner has also prayed for quashing of order dated 24th May, 2001 passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Purnia (hereinafter referred to as “Addl. Sessions Judge”), whereby, Cr. Revision No. 349 of 2000/Tr. No. 32 of 2000 was rejected, which was preferred against the order of cognizance.

3. Short fact of the case is that initially, on the basis of written report filed by the petitioner, an F.I.R., vide Araria P.S. Case No. 244 of 1996, was registered for the offence under Sections 379 & 511 of the IPC. In the F.I.R., it was disclosed by the petitioner that from the pond of the petitioner, stealthily fishing was done and lock of the house of the petitioner was tampered. In the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top