2014 Supreme(Pat) 436
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MIHIR KUMAR JHA, J.
Ravi Kant Jha & Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna & Others – Respondents
C.W.J.C. No. 3076 of 2013
Decided On : 30.4.2014
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No. 1.
For the Respondents: Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, Shyameshwar Kumar Singh.
Statutory provisions and previous court rulings govern compassionate ground appointments, and appointments made in accordance with the Rules are considered valid.
Headnote:
Compassionate Ground Appointment - Statutory Provisions - Bihar Panchayat Teacher Appointment Rules 2006, Bihar Nagar Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan avam Sewa Sart) Niyamawali-2012 - The court rejected the claim for fresh appointment on compassionate ground against a sanctioned post of regular teacher or any Class-III post, citing statutory provisions and previous court rulings. The appointment of the petitioners on compassionate ground as Prakhand/Nagar Shikshak in accordance with the Rules was found to be valid, and the claim for appointment on compassionate ground on a regular post of teachers was disallowed.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought appointment on compassionate ground against the regular post of teachers, claiming discrimination and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of the petitioners on compassionate ground as Prakhand/Nagar Shikshak in accordance with the Rules was valid, and there was no error in the appointment. The claim for fresh appointment on compassionate ground against a sanctioned post of regular teacher or any Class-III post was rejected.
Issues: Claim for appointment on compassionate ground against regular post of teachers, discrimination, violation of constitutional articles.
Ratio Decidendi: The appointment of the petitioners on compassionate ground as Prakhand/Nagar Shikshak in accordance with the Rules was valid, and the claim for appointment on compassionate ground on a regular post of teachers was disallowed.
Final Decision: The application was dismissed as wholly misconceived.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties as with regard to the following reliefs prayed in this writ application:-
"To appoint the petitioners in Class-III post on compassionate ground as the petitioners are eligible for appointment on such post and several other persons whose cases are exactly similar to the writ petitioners have already been given appointment on compassionate ground over Class-III post in different districts of the State of Bihar.
To hold that appointment of several persons, whose cases are identical with that of the writ petitioners, on compassionate ground over Class-III post providing for regular pay scale and not giving the same treatment to the writ petitioners is gross case of discrimination and the same violates Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India."
2. From the reading of the averments in the writ petition it would appear that after the petitioners have already been appointed on compassionate ground as Prakhand Teacher/ Nagar Teacher they have now a vision of being appointed again on compassionate ground against the regular post of teachers.
3. The petitioners, however, forget that in view of the statutory provisions made in the Rules ever since 01.07.2006 every dependant of a teacher of regular cadre who has died in harness, his/her ward can get appointment on compassionate ground only on the post of Prakhand/Panchayat/Nagar Shikshak.
4. In that view of the matter, this Court will not find any error in the appointment of the petitioners whose appointment has already been made as is evidenced from the statement and the chart enclosed in paragraph no. 3 of the writ application, relevant portion whereof reads as follows:-
Petitioner Date of Appointment Designation Place of posting
1. 17.05.2010 Nagar Teacher Govt. Middle School, Hindu Anathalaya, Bettiah
2. 25.06.2011
Nagar Teacher
Govt. Middle School, Gandak Colony, Bettiah
3. 20.07.2011
Block Teacher
Govt. Middle School, Banuchapar, Bettiah.
4. 07.12.2010
Nagar Teacher
Govt. Primary School, Naurangabad, Bettiah
5. 31.10.2007
Block Teacher
Upgraded Middle School, Shekh Toli, Bairia, Urdu
6. 06.07.2010
Nagar Teacher
Govt. Middle School, Islamiya, Urdu, Ganj No. 2, Bettiah
7. 23.12.2010
Nagar Teacher
Govt. Middle School, Krishnabagh, Bettiah
8. 06.07.2010
Nagar Teacher Adarsh Bipin Middle School, Bettiah
9. 17.08.2011
Block Teacher
Upgraded Middle School, Bagahi, Gyaniji Ka tola, Bairia
5. Once this aspect becomes clear that all the petitioners being wards of deceased teachers have been appointed either as Prakhand/Nagar Shikshak in terms of Bihar Panchayat Teacher Appointment Rules 2006, there would be no difficulty for this Court now to reject their claim for their fresh appointment on compassionate ground against a sanctioned post of regular teacher or any Class-III post. First of all the post of regular teachers has already been abolished and now post of teacher in each and every school is being filled up by way of Prakhand/Panchayat/Nagar Shikshak in terms of Bihar Panchayat Teacher Appointment Rules 2006 as amended from time to time. Thus in the absence of regular post, it would be a valid ground for denying appointment on compassionate ground to the petitioners.
6. The petitioners however claim that they ought to have been appointed on any other Class-III post. That however was impossible in view of the statutory Rule which reads as follows:-
^^vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu;kstu & f'k{kd@f'k{kdsRrj dfeZ;ksa ds vkfJrksa dh vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu/kkZfjr ;ksX;rk ds vuq:i iapk;r f'k{kd@iz[k.M f'k{kd ds in ij miyC/k fjfDr;ksa ds fo:) fu;kstu fd;k tk ldsxkA ;fn os Li"V :i ls blds fy, viuh lgefr nsrs gSa fu;kstu ljdkj ds dkfeZd foHkkx }kjk vuqdEik ds vk/kkj ij fu;qfDr laca/kh fu/kkZfjr vU; 'krksZa ds vkyksd es mijksDr lfefr;ksa }kjk fd;k tk ldsxkA vizf'kf{kr vkfJrksa dks fu;kstu ds ckn mUgsa vf/kdre 6 o"kksaZ ds vUnj izf'k{k.k izkIr dj ysuk vfuok;Z gksxkA**
7. In fact a similar provision has been made for the post of