SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Pat) 537

RAKESH KUMAR
Krishna Kanhaiya Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Satish Chandra Jha
For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kr Uapdhyay SC20

Order

The sole petitioner, invoking writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for quashing of order contained in memo no. 6935 dated 15/5/2012 issued under the signature of Joint Secretary to the Government, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, whereby the reviewing authority has rejected the review application of the petitioner. The said order was passed in compliance with the order dated 31/1/2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23524 of 2011 by a bench of this court. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of resolution bearing memo no. 1399 dated 3/2/2011 whereby after conclusion of departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner in terms of Rule 17(2) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control And Appeal) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “C.C.A. Rules, 2005”) punishment of stoppage of five increment with non-cumulative effect has been awarded to the petitioner by the disciplinary authority.

2. Short fact of the case is that the petitioner while posted as Circle Officer, Bind -cum- Rahui (Nalanda) by order contained in Memo No. 340 dated 29/1/2009 issued under the signature of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top