2014 Supreme(Pat) 811
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
I. A. ANSARI AND V.N. SINHA, JJ.
(24.7.2014)
Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 878, 874, 865, 859, 898, 871, 825, 899 with 778 of 2009
Rajan Tiwari (in 878)
Vijay Kumar Shukla @ Munna Shukla (in 874)
Mantu Tiwari (in 865)
Lallan Singh (in 859) : Appellants
Captan Sunil Singh (in 898)
Ram Niranjan Choudhary (in 871)
Suraj Bhan Singh @ Suraj Singh @ Surja (in 825)
Mukesh Singh (in 899)
Shashi Kumar Rai (in 778)
Vs.
The State of Bihar through C.B.I. (in 878, 874, 859, 898, 871, 825, 899) : Respondents
The State of Bihar (in 865)
For the Appellant : M/s Surendra Singh, Dr. Abhishek Priyadarshi (in 878); M/s Ajay Kumar Thakur, Sunil Kumar (in 874); M/s K.P. Singh, Ram Binay Singh, Jyotsana Kumari (in 865);
M/s Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Raj Kumar (in 859); Mr. Raj Kumar (in 898); Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai (in 871); M/s Surendra Singh, Raj Kumar (in 825); M/s Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, Raj Kumar (in 899); Mr. Md. Sufiyan (in 778).
For the C.B.I. : M/s Sidharth Luthra, Bipin Kumar Sinha, Supriya Juneja, Sunil Kumar Ravi, Shashi Shankar Kumar Prasad (in all).
Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860–Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 120B–Arms Act, 1959–Section 27–Murder of MLA and his bodyguard–There is inconsistency between evidence of eye-witnesses–None of security personnel examined by prosecution–Failure to produce Forensic Science Laboratory report is indicative of fact that in fact no seizure was made from place of occurrence and seizure-list is mere paper work–Information given by wife of deceased is hit by rule of hear-say evidence–Various shortcomings noticed in investigation conducted by Police–Criminal conspiracy cannot be said to be proved in absence of necessary facts indicating foundation of such conspiracy–Prosecution having failed to establish foundation of conspiracy by proving location of Land Line in residence of Accused No.1, further edifice of conspiracy hatched to eliminate deceased MLA may not be sustained–Evidence of eye-witnesses not fit to be relied upon–In view of several glaring infirmities found in prosecution case, complicity of accused persons in murder of MLA and his bodyguard could not be proved–Accused persons deserve grant of benefit of doubt–Impugned judgment of conviction set aside–Appeals allowed. (Paras 121 to 142)
A.I.R. 2011 Supreme Court 72; A.I.R. 2005 Supreme Court 3820; 2012 Cri.L.J. 2395; AIR 2012 Supreme Court 1249; A.I.R. 2005 Supreme Court 716; (2005) 3 SCC 169; A.I.R. 1980 Supreme Court 873; A.I.R. 2010 Supreme Court 566; A.I.R. 1976 Supreme Court 294; A.I.R. 1988 Supreme Court 1883; 2012(2) PCCR 11; 2011 CRI.LJ 3931; A.I.R. 2011 Supreme Court 632; (2007) 12 SCC 341; A.I.R. 1971 Supreme Court 1865; (2003) 8 SCC 745; A.I.R. 1972 Supreme Court 283; A.I.R. 2010 SC 2768; AIR 2010 Supreme Court 979; A.I.R. 1981 Supreme Court 650; A.I.R. 1976 Supreme Court 2488; A.I.R. 2001 Supreme Court 990; A.I.R. 2006 Supreme Court 1656; A.IR. (33) 1946 Privy Council 38, 41; A.I.R. 1972 Supreme Court 468; (2010) 6 SCC 736; (1997) 6 SCC 171; (2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 10; (2012) 7 Supreme Court Cases 80; 2012 (11) SCALE 637; 2012 (5) SCALE 561; 2007 (2) JCC 1113; 1991 (3) SCC 627; 1976 SCC (Cri.) 160; AIR 1959 Supreme Court 1012; (2009) 6 SCC 450; (1997) 4 SCC 161; (1996) 10 SCC 360; AIR 1984 SC 1622; AIR 1939 Privy Council 47; 2011 Cri.L.J. 4643; 2010 Cri.L.J. 4777; 1995 Cri. L.J. 2588; (F.B.), 1967 Cri.L.J. 52; AIR 1930 Allahabad 561; (2008) 13 SCC 271; (2011) 11 SCC 111; (1964) 7 SCR 361; AIR1976 SC 2304; (2013) 7 SCC 6291; 1998 SCC (Cri) 886; (1972) 2 SCC 640; 2012) 8 SCC 263; 2003 Cri.L.J. 3876; 1976 Cri.L.J. 758; 1983 Cri.L.J. 1694; 1999 Cri.L.J. 3124; 1995 Cri.L.J. 866; (2005) 9 SCC 103; (2005) 1 SCC 608–Referred.
2. Prosecution case, as set out in the fardbeyan of Amrendu Kumar Sinha (P.W. 10) (Exhibit-50), recorded by S.S.P. Yadav, Inspector-cum-Officer-in-Charge, Shastri Nagar Police Station, on 13.06.1998, at 21 hours is that informant, son of late Rishideo Narayan Prasad, resident of Bhawanipur Jirat, P.S. Chhitauni, District- East Champaran, recorded his statement before the Inspector-cum-Officer-in-Charge, Shastri Nagar Police Station in I.G.I.M.S. campus, Sheikhpura, Patna on 13.06.1998, around 9:00 P.M. that he had come from home to the I.G.I.M.S. campus, Patna, on 13.06.1998, around 6:30 P.M., to meet the M.L.A of his area Sri Brij Bihari Prasad, who was admitted in the ward for treatment. At the time of his arrival, M/S. Arbind Singh (P.W. 13), Onkar Singh (not examined), Ram Nandan Singh (P.W. 12), Mahanth Ashwani Das (P.W. 25), Paras Nath Choudhary (P.W. 1) and 2-4 o