NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Jadunandan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
2. There are two short issues as raised by Mr Md Waliur Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners in support of the writ petition. His first contention is that no such power could be exercised in terms of Section 4 (h) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 and secondly, in any view of the matter, the Collector though may be right in holding that the original cadastral survey khatiyan stood in the name of Nazir Shah, a Fakir and the estate was described as Fakirana, the Collector was wrong in assuming that it was a non-heritable estate.
3. Having considered the matter, in my view, on both the counts, the writ petition must succeed. First, if one refers to Section 4 (h) of the Act, it authorizes the Collector to enquire into and annul Jamabandis that were created after 01.01.1946 but this power is circumscribed by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.