NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, J.

1. These four Intra-Court Letters Patent Appeals have been filed assailing the judgment and order dated 20.8.2013 passed by learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 3640 of 2013 and analogous writ applications by which the learned Single Judge set aside the results of the Main examination with consequential direction to the Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as Commission) to prepare fresh results of the Graduate Level Combined Examination 2010, in accordance with the directions of the Court in relation to deletion/modification of questions and answers as given therein.

2. LPA No. 1200 of 2013 is by candidates who were not the party to the writ proceedings but had been declared selected as per the results first published but were then shown to be not qualified as per the revised results pursuant to the directions of this Court by the learned Single Judge. The other three Letters Patent Appeals i.e. LPA Nos. 1170, 1174 and 1352 all of 2013 are by candidates who were writ petitioners and assailed the judgment of the learned Single Judge in not granting them full relief in respect of all the questions that were questioned. Even after the re