Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

Since these two appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court, preferred against different orders passed by learned single Judge, dismissing the respective writ applications filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, arise out of the same process of selection to the post of Constables, through Central Selection Board of Constables, Bihar, Patna, and involve common issue, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common order.

2. Appellants of L.P.A. No. 1359 of 2015 are aggrieved by an order, dated 19.04.2012, passed by learned single Judge, in C.W.J.C. No. 16308 of 2011 (Vinod Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.), dismissing the writ application on the ground that they, having obtained less than the cut-off marks fixed for their category i.e. Backward Class-Male-Home Guard, could not be considered for appointment.

3. The appellant of L.P.A. No. 1545 of 2015 is aggrieved by an order, dated 12.03.2012, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18023 of 2011 (Dibiya Kumari Versus The State of Bihar), whereby her writ application came to be dismissed as she was found to hav