V.NATH
Chandeshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Rajia Devi – Respondent
Heard Mr.R.K.P.Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in support of this appeal.
2. The plaintiff is the appellant in this appeal against the judgment and decree of affirmance dismissing the suit.
3. The plaintiff filed the suit for eviction of the defendant and for realization of the arrears of rent. The defendant contested the assertions of the plaintiff and denied his status as tenant of the plaintiff. Specific issues were framed with regard to relationship of landlord and tenant in between the plaintiff and defendant. Both the courts below after scrutiny of the evidence of the parties, have reached to the concurrent finding of fact that the plaintiff has failed to establish his relationship of landlord and tenant with the defendant for the suit house. The suit was, therefore, dismissed and the appeal filed by the plaintiff thereafter has also been dismissed by the impugned judgment and decree.
4. In order to appreciate the submission on behalf of the appellant, it would be profitable here to take into notice some more facts. The plaintiff’s case is that the suit property belonged to the wife of the defendant who sold the same to the plaintiff for va
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.