SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 1159

RAKESH KUMAR
Binod Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar , AC to AAG No. 10

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mrityunjay Kumar, learned AC to AAG No. 10.

2. The petitioner, invoking writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing of an order dated 6.7.2005 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government, Minor Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna. By the said order after departmental enquiry the petitioner was inflicted with three punishment which are:- (1) censure for 2000-2001 (2) withholding of 3 increments without cumulative effect; and (3) the petitioner was not required to get anything during his suspension period save and except subsistence allowance. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of an order dated 18.4.2007 passed by Deputy Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar whereby appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of punishment was rejected.

3. Short fact of the case is that the petitioner on certain charges was put under suspension vide order contained in Memo No. 4770 dated 20.9.2003 in contemplation of the departmental enquiry. Thereafter memo of charge was served through Annexure - 5 to the writ petition a




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top