Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.

The recommendation for appointment of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 as Members (Judicial and Non-Judicial respectively) of the “Institution of Lokayukta” established under Section 3(1) of the Bihar Lokayukta Act, 2011 (Bihar Act 22, 2011) (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2011), has been put to challenge in the present proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of Public Interest Litigation.

2. Despite valid service of notices upon respondent No.6, he has not entered appearance. No Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of respondent No.5, though a learned Senior Counsel of this Court has addressed the Court defending selection of respondent No.5 and recommendation for appointment as a Member (Judicial) of the “Institution of the Lokayukta”.

3. The petitioner of the present application, under Public Interest Litigation, has described himself to be a social worker claiming to have consistently taken up public causes against corruption in the State of Bihar. There is a declaration in the writ application to the effe