SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 449

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Md. Imtyaj @ Md. Sonu @ Md. Imteyaz @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Supplementary affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners.

3. The petitioners seek bail in S.T. No. 906 of 2014 arising out of Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No.30 of 2014 dated 02.03.2014 instituted under Sections 25(1-AA)/25(1-B)(a)/25 (1-C)/26(1)(2) (3)/35 of The Arms Act, 1959 and 17/20 of The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

4. This is the second attempt by the petitioners for bail in the aforesaid case as earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 24.09.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30782 of 2014. However, the Court below was directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months. The same not having been done, the present application has been preferred by the petitioners renewing their prayer for bail.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the intervening circumstances after such rejection is that seven prosecution witnesses have been examined but none have named the petitioners and after 01.05.2015 there has been no progress in the trial till date. He submits that petitioner no. 2 is old and only because of the fact that guilt may be there










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top