AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Md. Imtyaj @ Md. Sonu @ Md. Imteyaz @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Supplementary affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners.
3. The petitioners seek bail in S.T. No. 906 of 2014 arising out of Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No.30 of 2014 dated 02.03.2014 instituted under Sections 25(1-AA)/25(1-B)(a)/25 (1-C)/26(1)(2) (3)/35 of The Arms Act, 1959 and 17/20 of The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
4. This is the second attempt by the petitioners for bail in the aforesaid case as earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 24.09.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30782 of 2014. However, the Court below was directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months. The same not having been done, the present application has been preferred by the petitioners renewing their prayer for bail.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the intervening circumstances after such rejection is that seven prosecution witnesses have been examined but none have named the petitioners and after 01.05.2015 there has been no progress in the trial till date. He submits that petitioner no. 2 is old and only because of the fact that guilt may be there
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.