MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Ajay Kumar Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Chaurasia – Respondent
1. I have already heard the learned counsels for both the parties.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the plaintiff-petitioner for setting aside the order dated 01.10.2015 passed by Subordinate Judge-XIV, Motihari (East Champaran) in Eviction Suit No.07 of 2009 whereby the court below rejected the amendment application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner.
3. The brief fact may be stated that the plaintiff-petitioner filed eviction suit on the ground of personal necessity and defaulter under the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982. The defendant-respondent filed contesting written statement denying the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. Thereafter issues were framed and parties adduced evidences in support of their respective cases. At the argument stage amendment application was filed by the plaintiff-petitioner praying for amendment in the plaint and sought to add a separate paragraph in the body of the plaint and also sought an alternative relief to the effect that if the court will find that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, the court may declare the r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.