V.NATH
Manoj Kumar Vyas, Son of Late Dalsukh Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
V. Nath, J.
Heard Mr. Manojeshwar Prasad Sinha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the different sets of opposite parties including the opposite party-State of Bihar.
2. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 30.03.2010 passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 20/2003 by which the learned court below has dismissed the miscellaneous case mainly on the ground of bar of limitation and also giving findings on the merits as well.
3. The facts relevant in the present context are that a T.S. No. 12/1989 was filed by the petitioners for declaration of their right, title, interest and possession over the suit land alongwith consequential reliefs. However, this suit was dismissed for default on 18.01.1996 for non-compliance of the order for filing the requisites for registered notice. From the order dated 18.01.1996 (Annexure-1) it transpires that on the said date neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present when the suit was called out. Thereafter the plaintiffs filed Miscellaneous Case No. 09/1996 for restoration of the suit under Order 9 Rule 4 C.P.C. However, this Miscellaneous Case No. 09/1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.