SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 1192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Hemant Gupta, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.
The Union of India through the General Manager, N.F. Railway & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Jainath son of Late Sharwan - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13334 of 2015
Decided On : 13-07-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. D.K. Sinha, Mr. Anil Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. A.B. Ojha, Mr. Nagendra Upadhayay

Appointment on compassionate grounds is admissible only if the employee is totally incapacitated and not in a position to continue in any post. If the employee is medically unfit for the current post but fit for an alternative suitable post in a lower medical category, the request for appointment on compassionate grounds to an eligible ward will not be admissible.

Headnote:

Compassionate Grounds - Appointment of Son - The court held that the appointment on compassionate grounds is to be considered only if an employee is totally incapacitated and is not in a position to continue in any post. If the employee is medically unfit for the current post but fit for an alternative suitable post in a lower medical category, the request for appointment on compassionate grounds to an eligible ward will not be admissible. The court found that the applicant was not totally incapacitated and was capable of working, thus the request for appointment on compassionate grounds was not admissible.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, a Gateman in the Engineering Department, was declared medically unfit for service and sought appointment on compassionate grounds for his son. The Tribunal allowed the application, but the petitioners argued that the applicant was not totally incapacitated and had sought voluntary retirement, thus the appointment of his son was not admissible.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained as the applicant was not totally incapacitated and was capable of working. The court held that the appointment on compassionate grounds was not admissible as per the relevant circular.

Issues: The issue was whether the appointment on compassionate grounds for the son of the applicant was admissible, considering the applicant's medical condition and capability to work.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the circular which stated that appointment on compassionate grounds is admissible only if the employee is totally incapacitated and not in a position to continue in any post. Since the applicant was not totally incapacitated and was capable of working, the request for appointment on compassionate grounds was not admissible.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ application, set aside the order passed by the Tribunal, and dismissed the Original Application filed by the applicant.

JUDGMENT :

Hemant Gupta, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The challenge in the present writ application is to an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (for short "the Tribunal") on 22nd of January, 2015 in O.A. No. 292 of 2013, whereby an Original Application filed by the respondent was allowed with a direction to reconsider the case of the applicant for appointment on compassionate grounds keeping in view the observations made in the order.

3. The respondent (hereinafter referred to as "the applicant") was working as a Gateman in Engineering Department. He was initially appointed on 18th of December, 1978. He was examined by the Medical Board at New Jalpaiguri Railway Hospital on 25th of January, 2011 and declared medically unfit for service. The grievance of the applicant is that since he has become medically unfit, the administration has to make an effort to give him alternative appointment. Since no such effort was made, therefore, one ward or son of the employee has to be given appointment.

4. The stand of the petitioners, inter alia, is that after being declared unfit for service, the applicant applied for voluntary retirement and also sought appointment on compassionate grounds of his son. It was pointed out by the petitioners that the applicant was having nine month's service left for superannuation. Therefore, his request for voluntary retirement was not accepted. Thus, the question of appointment of his son does not arise.

5. The learned Tribunal allowed the application relying upon an order passed by the Calcutta High Court in W.P.C.T. No. 412 of 2012. The Tribunal found that there is a provision to consider the request for appointment on compassionate grounds in case of totally incapacitated employee. Therefore, the claim of the applicant for appointment of his son on compassionate grounds cannot be declined.

6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and find that the order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained.

7. The appointment on compassionate grounds is dealt with a circular RBE No. 8/2000, Annexure-R-2 to the writ application. The relevant extract from the Circular reads as under :-

"2. Pursuant to the notification of "The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995," instructions were issued vide Board's letter No. E(NG)I/96/RE-3/9(2) dated 29.04.1999 (RBE 89/1999) laying down inter alia that, in cases where an employee has been medically invalidated decategorised and where the administration cannot find a suitable alternative post for such an employee, he may be kept on a supernumerary post in the grade in which he was working on regular basis, till such time a suitable post can be identified or till his retirement, whichever is earlier. As these instructions provided for continuation in service of a medically invalidated decategorised employee, there would be no occasion for an employee to be retired from service on medical ground. Therefore, according to these instructions, in such cases, the occasion to consider a request for appointment on compassionate ground of an eligible ward would not arise.

3. The matter has been reviewed pursuant to a demand raised by the staff side in the DC/JCM and it has now been decided that in cases where an employee is totally incapacitated and is not in a position to continue in any post because of his medical condition, he may be allowed to opt for retirement. In such cases request for appointment on compassionate ground to an eligible ward may be considered.

4. In the cases of medical decategorisation i.e. those cases in which an employee becomes medically unfit for the post held at present but is fit to perform the duties of an alternative suitable post in lower medical category, the request for appointment on compassionate ground to an eligible ward will not be admissible, even if the employee chooses to retire voluntarily on his being declared medically decategorised. Su





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top