SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 1236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.
Neha Sharma, Daughter of Sri Jagdish Prasad Sharma & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary-cum-Chairman, Bihar Vikas Mission, Government of Bihar, Patna & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case Nos. 12822, 15175, 13235 and 14096 of 2016
Decided On : 05-10-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Anita Kumari, Advocate, Mr. Gajendra Kumar Jha, Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha, Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha and Mr. Surya Kant Jha, Advocates, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. R. Tiwary and Mr. Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari, Advocates.
For the Bihar Vikas Mission :Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. K.K. Jha, A.A.G.-8 and Mr. Amish Kumar, AC to A.A.G.-8.
For the Respondents:Mr. Kaushal Kishore Jha, A.A.G.-8, Mr. Raisul Haque and Mr. Piyush Lall, Advocates, Mr. Prashant Pratap-GP-2.

Changing the selection criteria midstream is impermissible, and maintaining transparency and consistency in the selection process is crucial.

Headnote:

Bihar Vikas Mission - Employment Recruitment - Annexure-2, Annexure-3 - The court discussed the advertisement issued by Bihar Vikas Mission and the subsequent modification in the selection criteria. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining transparency and consistency in the selection process and referred to the decision in Yogesh Yadav v. Union of India to support the argument that changing the selection criteria midstream is impermissible.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed writ applications due to alleged irregularities in the employment recruitment process by Bihar Vikas Mission. They challenged the modification in the selection criteria and the failure to fill reserved posts.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the modification in the selection criteria was not arbitrary and was made to ensure the selection of the best talent. It emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards for such high-profile recruitment.

Issues: Irregularities in employment recruitment process, modification in selection criteria, failure to fill reserved posts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that changing the selection criteria midstream is impermissible and emphasized the importance of maintaining transparency and consistency in the selection process.

Final Decision: The writ applications were dismissed as the court found no merit in the petitioners' claims.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.

There are four set of writ applications with many a petitioners in the same, who have all chosen to file the writ application, because they have failed to find employment under what is known as "Bihar Vikas Mission" ("Mission" for brevity).

2. An advertisement was issued on 23rd of February, 2016, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-2 in C.W.J.C. No.12822 of 2016, which is the lead case. The requirement, the eligibility and the yardstick, which was required to be followed for the said selection would emerge from the entirety of Annexure-2, which runes into 22 pages.

3. The common refrain or submission across the board in the writ applications is that the respondent-authorities have themselves not followed the yardstick, which they had initially laid down in the advertisement. They have also failed in the objective of such recruitment, because many a posts have remained vacant, even though they were especially reserved for a particular category of candidates. It is also urged that subsequently by raising the bar for such selection in terms of Annexure-3, dated 25.07.2016, the whole process of selection, if not the actual selection, stands vitiated.

4. To put it simply, after Annexure-2 was issued and after the exercise was gone through, including the interview, authorities of the Mission held a meeting and decided certain parameters, which was to form the basis for final selection. The parameters in question is paragraph 4 of Annexure-3, which is reproduced herein below :

"4. After the completion of interview, as per the need and required proficiency of the organization like BVM and to maintained the quality of the professions/technical experts, a cut-off marks for interview and total cutoff marks were decided by the selection committee. In interview, the cut-off marks for General category is 60 marks, for BC & MBC category is 55 and for SC & ST category is 50. Over all cut-off for General category is 80, for BC & MBC category is 70 and for SC & ST category was decided to be 60. As per the above process following lists are being uploaded :-

I. Marking of all accepted candidates. Annexure – 1

II. List of candidates (two times of vacancy) called for interview. Annexure – II

III. Marks of candidates called for interview (with change of marks at the time of verification of documents) with interview marks. Annexure – III

IV. List of candidates finally selected as per the decision of selection committee. Annexure – IV

V. List as per para 2. Annexure – V"

5. The thrust of the argument is directed against paragraph 4 of Annexure-3 that this has been done as an afterthought. What has been decided in Annexure-3 was not part and parcel of the advertisement, contained in Annexure-2. The Courts have held and opined that the rule of the game must be known before the game begins and any tinkering thereafter is not permissible. Another limb of argument that even the vacancies, which were especially reserved for the women category candidates or other category of reservation have not been filled up, because of the irrational or arbitrary decision taken in Annexure – 3. This has defeated the right of these petitioners from consideration. The objectivity in the interview has not been maintained. Candidates, who have had even better marks in the academic and other parameters, have finally lost out, because of award of less marks.

6. Learned senior counsel, Mr. Lalit Kishore submits that the recruitment and appointment under the "Bihar Vikas Mission" is not a routine kind of hiring, which is being done by the State. The Mission is a registered society and it is a special purpose vehicle, which has been created to bring about rapid development in the State of Bihar by identifying seven missions, also described as "Nischay" or "Resolve", which are going to be the primary thrust areas. Only such persons who are highly talented and motivated, are supposed to be selected for providing inputs and monitoring the ongoing proje























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top