SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 669

JYOTI SARAN
Ajay Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raju Giri, Santosh Kumar Mishra
For the Respondents: Shashi Shekhar Tiwari

JUDGMENT :

Jyoti Saran, J.

1. Heard Mr. Raju Giri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwari, AC to AAG-15, for the State. With the consent of the parties the writ petition has been heard with a view to final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notification bearing Memo No. 8176 dated 27.8.2014 of the State Government in its Road Construction Department, whereby the petitioner has been reverted permanently to basic scale. A copy of the notification is impugned at Annexure-35 to the writ petition. The petitioner filed an application for review and which also has been rejected vide notification dated 24.11.2014 impugned at Annexure-37.

3. The charge-sheet, which is the foundation for the proceeding in question, is impugned at Annexure-25 and four charges have been set up against the petitioner for drawing the proceedings, who holds the post of an Executive Engineer (Mechanical) in the Road Construction Department of the State Government.

4. Charge No. 1 charges the petitioner of making arrangement for ensuring security of the seized machineries of M/s. Tantia















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top