SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 686

ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Patanjali Rishi.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. S. Dayal.

ARVIND SRIVASTAVA, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioners, by means of this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the Case No. 6 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case No. 3522 of 2010 registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 406, 120, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegations levelled, in short, in the complaint is to the effect that complainant, on being taken into confidence by the petitioners who were employees of the Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, showed interest for taking vehicle loan. She was made to sign on several blank papers. She took loan of Rs. 2,50,000/- which was to be returned in 48 installments with interest at the rate of 8 percent. She purchased a second hand truck bearing registration No. BR 33A 6324. She was regularly making payment of the installments in time, but all of a sudden her vehicle was seized. On enquiry, these petitioners told they could not do anything as the order of seizure has been received from the Managing Director of the Company. They neither gave copy of the agreement nor the vehic






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top