SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 728

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Biplab Ghosh Son Of Late Jitendra Nath Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Despite service of notice in terms of the order dated 14.08.2014 passed by a co-ordinate bench of this Court, no one has appeared on behalf of opposite party no. 2. Learned APP for the State is also not present, as is the general phenomenon in most of the cases.

3. The petitioner in the present case happens to be a short term employee of a company, namely, M/s Bio Start Product Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at 41/A, Naktala Road, Kolkata. A complaint, giving rise to Complaint Case No. 456(C)/2005, came to be filed in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna by one Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, proprietor of J.M.D. Traders. The complaint petition has been enclosed as Annexure-I of the present application.

4. It is the case of the complainant that under an agreement for C & F agent, executed between the complainant and the Company, a security deposit was made against the stock to be provided by the accused-company. The complainant alleged that he had deposited Rs. 4 lacs for starting the work as C & F agent of the accused-company. After getting the money, the company and accused persons, representing the company, star










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top