IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
Jawaheer Ram, Son of Late Sri Bhagwan Ram - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar, through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20409 of 2014
Decided On : 01-09-2017
Encroachment - Land Dispute - The court directed the respondent authorities to implement the order to remove encroachment from the land, citing specific provisions under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, which prescribe punishment for non-compliance and empower the Collector to get encroachment removed and recover the cost of removal.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ application for a direction to implement an order to remove encroachment from a specific land, which had not been implemented for twelve years.
Finding of the Court:
The court expressed dismay at the non-implementation of the order and highlighted specific provisions under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, which prescribe punishment for non-compliance and empower the Collector to get encroachment removed and recover the cost of removal.
Issues: Non-implementation of the order to remove encroachment, specific provisions under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the provisions under Section 6(2) and Section 7 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, which prescribe punishment for non-compliance and empower the Collector to get encroachment removed and recover the cost of removal.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent authorities to implement the final order to remove encroachment within six weeks, provided the order had not been challenged in appeal or set aside by any superior Court.
1. Heard Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Manish, learned SC-5 appearing for the State-respondents.
2. The present Writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities to implement the order dated 14.02.2013 passed in Land Disputes Resolution Case No. 123/2012-13 by Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Bikramganj, Rohtas, whereby he has directed respondent no. 4, Circle Officer, Bikramganj to remove the encroachment from the land appertaining to Khata No. 193, Plot Nos. 461 and 479 in pursuance to final order dated 15.03.2005 passed in Encroachment Case No. 01/2004-05.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the land appertaining to Khata No.193, Plot Nos. 461 and 479 is recorded as Anabad Bihar Sarkar. The nature of the land is Aam Rasta. The said land is adjacent to the raiyati land of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner and other villagers use the land in question as Aam Rasta. On the application of the petitioner, Encroachment Case No.01/2004-05 was initiated by respondent no.4, Circle Officer, Bikramganj. After getting report from Halka Karamchari and getting the land measured, the Circle Officer passed the final order in Encroachment Case No.01/2004-05 on 15.03.2005 and directed the encroachers to remove the encroachment. Subsequently, notices were issued under Section 6(2) in Form-II of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), as contained in Annexure-1,directing the encroachers, as contained in Annexure-1, to remove the encroachment, but the same was not removed. Subsequently, the petitioner filed Land Disputes Resolution Case No. 123/2012-13. The same was disposed of vide order dated 14.02.2013 by respondent no.3, Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Bikramganj, Rohtas, directing respondent no.4, the Circle Officer, Bikramganj, to get the encroachment removed in compliance of order dated 15.03.2005 passed in Encroachment Case No.01/2004-05 from the land in question, but till date, the same has not been removed. Hence, the present Writ application.
4. Mr. Kumar Manish, learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that, at present, he is not having any instruction whether the final order passed in encroachment proceeding has been implemented or the said order has been challenged in appeal or not, but if it has not been implemented or not been challenged in appeal or modified by any superior Court, the same will be implemented within a reasonable time frame.
5. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties, this Court is dismayed to find non-implementation or execution of the order, passed by a quasi judicial authority since last twelve years. There is specific provision under Section 6(2) of the Act punishing a person who fails to comply the order passed by the Collector under the Act by awarding punishment with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine up to Rs.20,000 or with both. Section 6(2) of the Act reads as follows :-
“6(2) If any person does not comply with the orders passed by the Collector under this Section, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine up to Rs.20,000 or with both.”
6. There is specific provision under Section 7 of the Act, which prescribes the procedure for implementing the final order. Section 7 of the Act reads as follows :-
“7. Power of the Collector to get encroachment removed and recover cost of the removal- If any person fails to comply with the orders passed by the Collector under Section 6 directing the removal of any encroachment by the date fixed, the Collector shall cause the encroachment to be removed in such manner as he deems fit and the cost of such removal shall be recovered from the such person.”
7. The above provision clearly stipulates that if any person fails to comply the order passed by the Collector under Section 6 of the Act directing the removal of any encroachment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.