SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1282

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Kedar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Birendra Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.A. Ahmad.

ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.:–Vide judgment of conviction dated 16.12.2014 and order of sentence dated 20.12.2014 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Barh, Patna in Sessions Trial No.360 of 2009, appellant Kedar Prasad has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 323 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months, under Section 450 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years as well as slapped with fine appertaining to Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo R.I. for three months, under Section 307 I.P.C. to undergo R.I. for four years as well as to pay fine appertaining to Rs.2,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo R.I. for six months with a further direction to run the sentences concurrently, while appellant Dilip Kumar @ Lallu has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 324 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year, under Section 379 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year, under Section 450 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years as well as to pay fine appertaining to Rs.1,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo R.I. for three months, under Section 307 I.P.C. and sentenced t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top