SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 153

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.
Anil Singh S/o Late Suresh Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 190 of 2015
Decided On : 05-01-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. V.R.P. Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Singh.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving a fact by a reliable witness, the burden on the prosecution, and the fatal impact of non-examination of the investigating officer and the absence of an injury report and doctor's examination.

Headnote:

Section 324 - Offence under Section 324 of the I.P.C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) - The court discussed the evidence presented, the requirement of proving a fact by a reliable witness, and the fatal impact of non-examination of the investigating officer and the absence of an injury report and doctor's examination. The court highlighted the burden on the prosecution, promptness in recording the F.I.R., and the lack of substantiation of the prosecution case.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were found guilty of an offence under Section 324 of the I.P.C. for assaulting the victim. The trial was found to be hopelessly conducted, with key witnesses failing to support the prosecution's case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to substantiate its case due to the lack of evidence and non-examination of key witnesses and the investigating officer. The judgment of conviction and sentence was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, resulting in the discharge of the appellants from their liabilities.

Issues: The issues revolved around the reliability of the evidence presented, the burden on the prosecution, and the impact of the non-examination of key witnesses and the investigating officer.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement of proving a fact by a reliable witness, the burden on the prosecution, and the fatal impact of non-examination of the investigating officer and the absence of an injury report and doctor's examination.

Final Decision: The judgment of conviction and sentence was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The appellants were discharged from their liabilities.

JUDGMENT :

1. Appellants Anil Singh and Ram Balak Singh have been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 324 of the I.P.C. and each one has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.03.2015 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No. 749 of 1986.

2. PW-1 Krishna Nandan Singh while was admitted at a clinic of Dr. Vijay Narayan Singh, situated at Nala Road, Patna gave his fard-bayan before the police official of Kadam Kuan P.S. on 29.03.1986 alleging inter-alia that while he was sleeping at his house in order to keep watch over his she-buffalo, he awaken on account of having been apprehended and then, found Anil Singh, Krishna Singh and Ram Balak Singh, who were armed with axe, farsa and chhura. He tried to get up, but the accused persons began to assault. Even then, he attempted, but was apprehended by Narayan Singh, Ramashrya Singh, Vilayati Singh and then thereafter, he was brutally assaulted by all of them. The motive for the occurrence has been shown as detention of mare belonging to Narayan Singh by him, though released subsequently.

3. After registration of Barahiya P.S. Case No. 42 of 1986, investigation was taken up and after concluding the same, chargesheet was submitted against all the accused persons, out of whom, accused Narayan Singh and Vilayati Singh died and so, proceeding against them was dropped. Proceeding against Krishna Singh and Ramashrya Singh were separated, on account of their nonappearance as a result of which, the trial commenced and continued against the appellants only and concluded in a manner, the subject matter of instant appeal.

4. Defence case, as is evident from mode of cross-examination as well as statement recorded under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. is that of complete denial as well as false implication on account of village politics.

5. From the record, it is evident that it happens to be hopelessly conducted trial. Neither I.O. has been examined nor doctor Even injury report has not been exhibited. Not only this, save and except two witnesses that means to say, injured Krishna Nandan Singh and Yugeshwar Singh and none other has been examined even to the extent of one Vijay Singh, who stood as F.I.R. attesting witness.

6. Now, coming to the status of the witnesses, it is evident that PW-2 failed to support case of the prosecution, whereupon was declared hostile. Now, remains the evidence of PW-1, injured himself. Before going to discuss the evidence of PW-1, the initial version suggests that he happens to be an injured. Section 134 of the Evidence Act discloses requirement of proving a fact by a reliable, trustworthy witness, and for that, did not require the same to be proved by number of the witnesses. Even if the evidence of single witness is found trustworthy, then in that circumstance, conviction could be. Keeping the aforesaid requirement of law, the evidence of PW-1 is to be seen. During his examination-in-chief, it is evident that he had alleged against the appellants including others to have inflicted axe, farsa, chhura blow repeatedly as a result of which, he sustained injury. Furthermore, he had also stated that during course of fleeing, he was intercepted by Narayan Singh, Ramashraya Singh and Vilayati Singh and then thereafter, again been assaulted. At Para-2, he had stated that the villagers lifted him to police station and from police station to hospital where he was treated and then, he was referred to Patna. Then had exhibited the fard-bayan. During cross-examination at Para-9, he had stated that blood had fallen 5-6 steps north to his cot, whereupon he was sleeping. He remained lying for 20 minutes and then thereafter, villagers came and lifted him. He remained at police station for half an hour. He was accompanied by Bhola Singh, Bimal Singh, Jugeshwar Singh, Ramavtar Singh and others. Then, he was taken to hospital where Dr. Ramanugrah Babu treated him and then thereaft



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top