SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SHIVAJI PANDEY, J.
Radha Flour Mill (P) Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Electricity – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case Nos. 12134 of 2015, 3380, 3391 of 2017
Decided On : 27-11-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mriganjk Mauli, Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sanket.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Mr. Vijay Kr. Verma, Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Mr. S. Kumar.

The benefit arising from the industrial policy has to be given its full effect once the industry falls under the policy, and the interpretation of the policy should be normal and plain to derive its real purpose.

Headnote:

Industrial Policy - Benefit Entitlement - Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011 - Clause 2, Clause 4, Clause 9, Clause 10 - The court discussed the entitlement of benefits under the 2011 Industrial Policy of Bihar, specifically focusing on the exemption for Monthly Minimum Charges/Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand. The court interpreted the policy to determine the period of entitlement of the benefit of remission with respect to electric bill. The court held that the benefit should be given its full effect to serve the purpose and object of the policy in attracting investors.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a registered company, set up a flour mill for manufacturing Atta, Suji, Maida, and Chhokar and applied for electric connection and remission of electric bill under the 2011 Industrial Policy. The dispute arose when the Industrial Policy 2011 Scheme ended, and the power supply was disconnected due to non-payment of the bill.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the benefit of concession of exemption for Monthly Minimum Charge/Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand should be granted in terms of Clause (vi) of the Clause 2 of the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011.

Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of the 2011 Industrial Policy and the entitlement of benefits, specifically the exemption for electric charges, after the termination of the policy.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once the industry falls under the policy, the benefit arising from that policy has to be given its full effect. The court emphasized that the interpretation of the policy should be normal and plain to derive its real purpose.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order passed by the Director, Technical Development Department, Government of Bihar and issued a mandamus to grant the benefit of concession of exemption for Monthly Minimum Charge/Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand in terms of Clause (vi) of the Clause 2 of the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In all the cases, since common issue has been raised, these are being disposed of by this common order. For convenience, the facts of C.W.J.C. No. 12134 of 2015 are being taken into consideration.

3. In the present case, a question has been raised about entitlement of the benefit emanating from 2011 Industrial Policy issued by the Government of Bihar which provides the operation period of the policy is for five years and the benefit would be given to those industry which have been established and came in commercial production within five years from 1st July, 2011. So, a question has been raised if the person is covered under the policy decision, whether the relief, which has been mentioned in the policy, will come to an end with the life of the policy or the person will be entitled for the benefit of five years irrespective of the termination of the life of the policy.

4. The petitioner is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Radha Nagar, Motihari, East Champaran, Bihar. The petitioner has set up a flour mill under the name and style of Radha Flour Mill Private Limited for manufacturing Atta, Suji, Maida and Chhokar and has been working since 10.2.1989. The Government of Bihar in order to attract domestic and foreign investment as well as revival and expansion of business of the existing industrial unit by providing right industrial ambient and with an intention to generate employment and its promotion the Government has come up with the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy of 2011. For attracting the investors, certain benefits have been extended to the establishment which fall under the parameter of the Industrial Policy. In terms of the 2011 Industrial Policy, different types of benefits have been conferred under different heads having been mentioned in Clause-2 of the Industrial Policy, 2011 which includes benefit such as exemption for Monthly Minimum Charges/ Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand and the benefit has been conferred for five years. It will be relevant to extract the sub-clause (vi) of Clause 2 which reads as follows:-

"(vi) Monthly Minimum Charges/Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand ls NwV & orZeku dk;Zjr bdkb;ksa rFkk ubZ bdkb;ksa dks Monthly Minimum Charges/Minimum Base Energy Charge/Demand/Billing Demand vFkok fcgkj fo|qr fofu;ked vk;ksx ds }kjk fu/kkZfjr VSªfQd vkns'k esa of.kZr fdlh vU; uke ls Minimum Guarantee (Energy & Demand) 'kqYd ls NwV ubZ vkS|ksfxd uhfr ds ÁHkkoh gksus dh frfFk ls nh tk,xhA ;g lqfo/kk ikap o"kksZ ds fy, ns; gksxhA**

5. The Industrial Policy provides capital subsidy and has conferred tax incentive and different period has been provided in different nature of incentive, so far the benefit for the electric charges is concerned, it has been limited to five years and under the heading of tax, the benefit for certain class of the industries have been given 10 years with certain conditions which provides that the Brewery and Distillery will be reimbursed as maximum only 25% of the VAT charges applicable to 10 years and the ceiling will be 300% of the capital investment. So, different types of incentives under the different heads were given and the present case is only confined to the benefit for the electrical charges. The Clause-4 of Annexure-1 Industrial Policy, 2011 defines the “New Industrial Unit” stipulates means of industrial unit in which the commercial production has commenced within five years from July, 2011. Clause 9 of Annexure-1, Industrial Policy, 2011 contained in Annexure-2 has also mentioned date of production which reads as follows:-

^^9- mRiknu dh frfFk & fdlh vkS|ksfxd bdkbZ esa izkjaHk gksus dh frfFk dk rkRi;Z ml frfFk ls gksxk] tcls bdkbZ okLro esa ml lkexzh dk okf.kfT;d mRiknu izkjaHk dh fy;k gks] ftlds fy, og fucaf/kr dh xbZ gksA y?kq ,oa e/;e vkS|ksfxd bdkb;ksa ds mRiknu dh frfFk ds laca/k esa lacaf/kr egkizca/kd] ftyk m|ksx dsUnz vFkok iazca/k f





















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top