SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1386

JYOTI SARAN
Randhir Bhardwaj, S/o Sri Surendra Nath Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Arif, Adv. Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mohammed Arif, Adv. Mr. Navin Prasad Singh, Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Mr. Awanish Nandan Sinha, GP-21 Mr. Sarvesh Kr.Singh, AAG-13 Mr. Gajendra Pd.Yadav, SC-17 Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG-1 Mr. Chandra Bhushan Das, Adv. Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Mr. Dinu Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, AC to GA-11 Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jahan Ara, AC to GP-14 Mr. Gajendra Pd.Yadav, SC-17 Mr.Mr. Vinod Kumar Kanth, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Mrigank Mouli, Adv. Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 Dr. Kamal Deo Sharrma, AC to GA-11 Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2

JUDGMENT :

1. In each of this batch of writ petitions, the grievance of the petitioners is common and that is the issue of grant/refusal of weightage by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’) as against the work experience gained by the incumbents having served on the post of Agriculture Coordinators, Assistant Technical Managers, Block Technical Managers, Subject-matter Specialists and other equivalent posts available in the Agriculture Department.

2. It is in consideration of the commonness of the grievance raised that the writ petitions have been heard analogous and with the consent of the parties are being disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

3. While the arguments on behalf of the petitioners have mainly been led by Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned senior counsel and Mr. Dinu Kumar with other counsel supplementing the same, the State is represented by the respective State Counsel, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission is heard through Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Principal Additional Advocate General No.1 and the private/intervenor respondents have been heard through Mr. Vinod Kumar Kanth, learned senior Advocate assisted by the Advocates o


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top