ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Pawan Kumar S/o Late Saryug Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. Petitioner, by means of this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the order dated 10.11.2011 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Sirdala P.S. Case No. 34 of 2010, whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate has made certain correction in the earlier order of cognizance dated 08.08.2011, whereby cognizance was taken under section 498A, 323, 307, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and further for quashing of the order dated 09.12.2016 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 56 of 2016 by which the learned Sessions Judge, Nawada has dismissed the Cr. Misc. Case filed by the petitioner against the order dated 10.11.2011.
3. Facts of the case, in short, is that a first information report was lodged against 12 named accused persons vide Sirdala P.S. Case No. 34 of 2010 for the offence punishable under sections 498A, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. After investigation, police submitted charge-sheet against this petitioner. Accused No. 4, S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.