SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1408

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Sri Sri 108 Ram Janaki Mandir Asthan Kaitola – Appellant
Versus
Kapildeo Jha @ Kapildeo Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shashi Nath Jha

ORDER :

1. Heard the learned counsel, Mr. Shashinath Jha, for the petitioner, learned senior counsel, Mr. J.S. Arora, for the respondent No.3 and the learned counsel, Mr. Ratnagar Jha, appearing for respondent No.1 and 2.

2. By the impugned order dated 09.03.2016, the learned Sub Judge Ist, Madhubani in Title Suit No.415 of 2013 has rejected the application filed by the plaintiff petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 Sub Rule 2 CPC for adding some person as party defendant in the suit on the ground that the suit is ready for hearing and secondly that no relevancy has been stated by the plaintiff as to whether they are sought to be added and thirdly that the High Court in Misc. Appeal No.345 of 2014 has directed the Court below to dispose of the suit expeditiously.

3. From perusal of the application filed by the plaintiff petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, it appears that the plaintiff clearly stated that the defendant No.1 have sold the property to many persons and recently the plaintiff came to know that the defendant No.1 has sold the persons mentioned in the application who are necessary party, therefore, the plaintiff filed the application for adding them as party.

4. Therefore, in v





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top