MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Sri Sri 108 Ram Janaki Mandir Asthan Kaitola – Appellant
Versus
Kapildeo Jha @ Kapildeo Das – Respondent
1. Heard the learned counsel, Mr. Shashinath Jha, for the petitioner, learned senior counsel, Mr. J.S. Arora, for the respondent No.3 and the learned counsel, Mr. Ratnagar Jha, appearing for respondent No.1 and 2.
2. By the impugned order dated 09.03.2016, the learned Sub Judge Ist, Madhubani in Title Suit No.415 of 2013 has rejected the application filed by the plaintiff petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 Sub Rule 2 CPC for adding some person as party defendant in the suit on the ground that the suit is ready for hearing and secondly that no relevancy has been stated by the plaintiff as to whether they are sought to be added and thirdly that the High Court in Misc. Appeal No.345 of 2014 has directed the Court below to dispose of the suit expeditiously.
3. From perusal of the application filed by the plaintiff petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, it appears that the plaintiff clearly stated that the defendant No.1 have sold the property to many persons and recently the plaintiff came to know that the defendant No.1 has sold the persons mentioned in the application who are necessary party, therefore, the plaintiff filed the application for adding them as party.
4. Therefore, in v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.