SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL, J.
National Insurance Comp. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Kamla Devi and Ors - Respondent
Misc. Appeal No. 257 of 2012
Decided On : 14-05-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raj Kumar Singh Vikram
For the Respondent: Arjun Prasad and Ram Bhushan Prasad

Liability of Insurance Company to pay compensation to claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle in case of a gratuitous passenger.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - COMPENSATION - M.V. Act Section 166 - Summary: The court discussed the violation of insurance policy terms and conditions in the case of a gratuitous passenger and referred to relevant judgments such as National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bommithi Subbhayamma & Ors. and Manuara Khatun & Ors. v. Rajesh Kr. Singh & Ors. The court directed the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle, with the liberty to recover the same from its owner after payment.

Fact of the Case:

The claimants filed a case under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for compensation due to the death of Dinesh Singh in a motor vehicle accident. The appellant, National Insurance Company Limited, appealed against the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal, arguing that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and the insurance policy did not cover the risk of gratuitous passengers.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and there was a violation of the insurance policy terms and conditions. It directed the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle, with the liberty to recover the same from its owner after payment.

Issues: Violation of insurance policy terms and conditions, liability of Insurance Company for compensation to claimants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to the claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle in case of a gratuitous passenger, with the liberty to recover the same from its owner after payment.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with the modification in the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal, directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle, with the liberty to recover the same from its owner after payment.

JUDGMENT :

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents-claimant Nos. 1 to 4 on this Miscellaneous Appeal. This Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the National Insurance Company Limited against the judgment dated 27.9.2011 and award dated 10.7.2012 passed by Additional District Judge-ll-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Nawada in Motor Vehicle Case No. 4 of 2001 whereby the learned Tribunal allowing the claim petition of the respondents-claimants directed the National Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 3,50,000/- along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the order i.e. 27.9.2011 to the claimants-respondents.

2. Factual Matrix of the case is that claimants-respondent nos. 1 to 4 filed Motor Vehicle Claim Case No. 4 of 2001 under Section 166 of the M.V. Act against the appellant for awarding compensation on account of death of Dinesh Singh who happened to be husband of Claimant no. 1 and father of the claimant nos. 2 to 4 in the motor vehicle accident with the case in succinct that on 25.5.2000 at around 7 PM, Dinesh Singh was travelling by a tractor bearing registration no. BR-27-1075 from Roh Bazar to Village-Mahrawa. Driver of the said tractor was driving it very rashly and negligently resultantly when the said tractor arrived near Mahrawa Birdari it turned turtle resulting into the death of the deceased on the spot. Aforesaid accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of the offending tractor by its driver at the relevant time of accident. Further case of the claimants is that the deceased was aged about 40 years at the time of accident. He used to do the business of vegetable and dairy and used to earn Rs. 4,000/- per month from the said vocation.

3. Opposite party nos. 1 and 2 appeared in the case, but only opposite party no. 1-National Insurance Company Limited filed the written statement. Opposite party no. 2 was debarred from filing written statement while the case proceeded ex-parte against opposite party no. 3-driver of the offending vehicle. The claimants adduced ocular as well as documentary evidence in buttress of their case.

4. After hearing the parties and perusing the record, learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid judgment and award as detailed in earlier paragraph.

5. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment and award, appellant-National Insurance Company Limited has preferred this miscellaneous appeal.

6. The appellant has preferred this appeal on the ground that the deceased Dinesh Singh was travelling by the aforesaid tractor sitting on the same as a gratuitous passenger and the said tractor was insured under the farming package for use of agricultural purpose only and not for carrying passenger and moreover premium of only driver has been paid and Insurance Company does not cover the risk of gratuitous passenger. As the deceased was travelling on the tractor in question as gratuitous passenger in utter violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, Insurance Company is not liable to pay any compensation to the claimants indemnifying the owner of the vehicle. Appellant has relied upon the judgment passed by this Court in M.A. No. 453 of 2012 (The United India Insurance Company Limited v. Biltan Sao and Others) in buttress of their argument to the effect that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay any compensation in case of gratuitous passenger as there is violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy.

7. On the other hand, it is submitted by learned counsel for the claimants-respondents that the deceased happens to be businessman and was travelling on the said tractor after purchasing vegetables, hence he was not a gratuitous passenger. As the deceased has died due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver and the said tractor was insured by National Insurance Company Limited, hence the ap




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top