SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1408

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
Rikesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, Adv., Ajay Kumar, Adv., Sandhya Sharma, Adv., Bipin Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned APP for the State on this Criminal Appeal.

2. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 06.03.2013 and order of sentence dated 12.03.2013 passed by learned Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Katihar in Sessions Trial no. 265 of 2005 arising out of Katihar P.S. Case No. 284 of 2003 whereby the learned trial court convicted the accused Ramawtar Yadav and Rikesh Kumar Yadav for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and accused Nilesh Yadav for the offence punishable under Sections 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo S.I. for six months each under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and further sentenced accused Nilesh Yadav to undergo R.I. for five years and also slapped him with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for one year under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The factual matrix of the case is that Katihar P.S. Case No. 284 of 2003 was instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 436 of the Indian Penal Code against accused




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top