AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHI, J.

1. Heard Shri Kaushal Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner. An Interlocutory Application has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record. The office is directed to give a number to this Interlocutory Application.

2. The writ petition has been framed primarily on the ground that the petitioner has been deprived of the opportunity to be a candidate for selection and appointment for the post of District Judge (Entry Level), inasmuch as, had the advertisement been made earlier, the applicant petitioner would not have crossed the age bar so as to make him ineligible.

3. The argument, in essence, is that not holding of the examinations timely has resulted in this deprivation to the petitioner which violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

4. We have also heard the learned counsel for the High Court, who has invited the attention of the Court to the earlier Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 3rd of February, 2015 in C.W.J.C. No. 1900 of 2015 where the same issue raised was decided and the petition was dismissed. The judgment is extracted here in under:-

“In these writ petitions, the petitioners feel aggrieved by the stipulat